Publications by authors named "D Santare"

Our study aimed to evaluate the association between gastric cancer (GC) and higher concentrations of the metabolites L-carnitine, γ-butyrobetaine (GBB) and gut microbiota-mediated trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) in the circulation. There is evidence suggesting that higher levels of TMAO and its precursors in blood can be indicative of either a higher risk of malignancy or indeed its presence; however, GC has not been studied in this regard until now. Our study included 83 controls without high-risk stomach lesions and 105 GC cases.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We aimed to determine the diagnostic value of anti-parietal cell antibodies (anti-PCA), anti-intrinsic factor antibodies (anti-IFA), pepsinogen ratio (PGI/II), and gastrin-17 (G-17) in corpus-restricted atrophic gastritis (CRAG) detected by ELISA (Inova, Biohit). Our study compared 29 CRAG cases against 58 age- and sex-matched controls with mild or no atrophy. Anti-PCA and anti-IFA positive cutoff values were ≥25 units for both.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The accuracy of plasma pepsinogen (Pg) as a marker for precancerous gastric lesions (PGL) has shown variable results. We aimed to identify factors associated with false negative (FN) cases in Pg testing and to adjust cut-off values for these factors in order to improve Pg yield. Plasma Pg was measured and upper endoscopy with biopsy was performed within the "Multicentric randomized study of eradication and pepsinogen testing for prevention of gastric cancer mortality: the GISTAR study".

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To identify dietary and lifestyle factors associated with decreased pepsinogen levels indicative of gastric atrophy.

Methods: Participants aged 40 to 64 from the "Multicentric randomized study of H. pylori eradication and pepsinogen testing for prevention of gastric cancer mortality (GISTAR study)" in Latvia tested for serum pepsinogen, as well as for Helicobacter pylori infection by 13 C-urea breath test or serology were included.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Discrepancies between histology and serology results for detection could be caused by a variety of factors, including a biopsy sampling error, expertise of the pathologist, natural loss of infection due to advanced atrophy, or a false-positive serology in the case of a previous infection, since antibodies may be present in blood following recovery from the infection.

Aims: To identify true -positive individuals in discrepant cases by serology and histology using real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) as a gold standard.

Methods: Study subjects with discrepant histology and serology results were selected from the GISTAR pilot study data base in Latvia.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF