Chapter 2 of the original consensus statement published in 2009 by IXA represents an excellent basis for the production of safe donor pigs and pig-derived materials for porcine islet xenotransplantation. It was intended that the consensus statement was to be reviewed at interval to remain relevant. Indeed, many of the original salient points remain relevant today, especially when porcine islet xenotransplantation is performed in conjunction with immunosuppressants.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Xenotransplantation using pig cells, tissues, or organs may be associated with the transmission of porcine microorganisms and the development of zoonoses. Among all porcine microorganisms porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) represent a special risk because they are integrated in the genome of all pigs and able to infect human cells. In previous preclinical and retrospective clinical trials of xenotransplantation, no transmission of PERV was observed.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPreviously, a strategy for monitoring pigs intended for cell transplantation was developed and successfully applied to several representative herds in New Zealand. A better understanding of porcine viruses' epidemiology in New Zealand has been achieved, and, as a result, a designated pathogen-free (DPF) herd has been chosen as a good candidate for xenotransplantation. This herd is free of all infectious agents relevant to xenotransplantation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPreviously a strategy for monitoring of pigs intended for cell transplantation was developed and successfully applied to several representative herds in New Zealand. A designated pathogen-free (DPF) herd has been chosen as a good candidate for xenotransplantation. This herd has previously tested free of infectious agents relevant to xenotransplantation and we present here an in depth study of porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) transmission.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF