Publications by authors named "D M McElvenny"

Objectives: According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer, styrene is probably carcinogenic for lymphohaematopoietic neoplasms, with insufficient evidence for other cancer sites. We compared mortality and cancer incidence (for the first time) in a UK cohort occupationally exposed to high levels of styrene to that of the general population of England and Wales.

Methods: The follow-up for mortality ran from 1969 to 2022, while the follow-up for cancer incidence ran from 1971 to 2020.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: We aimed to develop a method for assessing occupational styrene exposures for application in epidemiological studies on risks of lymphohematopoietic neoplasms and other malignant and non-malignant diseases in the European and the US glass reinforced plastics industries.

Method: We estimated a linear mixed effects model based on individual airborne personal measurements of styrene from the glass reinforced plastics industry in Denmark, Norway, Sweden, UK, and the US. The most suitable model was chosen based on its predictive power as assessed using cross validation with different combinations of predictors; and by comparing their prediction errors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Workplace features such as ventilation, temperature and the extent of contact are all likely to relate to personal risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Occupations relating to healthcare, social care, education, transport and food production and retail are thought to have increased risks, but the extent to which these risks are elevated and how they have varied over time is unclear.

Methods: We searched for population cohort studies conducted in Europe that compared coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes between two or more different occupational groups.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • A study checks if not using compression after varicose vein treatment (via ablation) has similar long-term results compared to using compression, following a previous trial's short-term results.
  • After 27 months, 64.6% of patients with compression and 63% without it were checked, with both groups showing similar rates of vein closure (80.7% vs. 79.3%).
  • Quality of life measures also showed no significant differences between the groups, indicating that for most patients, post-procedural compression might not be necessary for effective treatment outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF