PRIDASE 2024 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies in endodontics: A consensus-based development.

Studies investigating the accuracy of diagnostic tests should provide data on how effectively they identify or exclude disease in order to inform clinicians responsible for managing patients. This consensus-based project was undertaken to develop reporting guidelines for authors submitting manuscripts, which describe studies that have evaluated the accuracy of diagnostic tests in endodontics. These guidelines are known as the Preferred Reporting Items for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in Endodontics (PRIDASE) 2024 guidelines.

Effect of Continuous Chelation Irrigation Using DualRinse HEDP+3% NaOCl with or without High-power Sonic Activation on Debris and Smear Layer Removal.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the effect of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) combined with a novel chelating agent DualRinse HEDP (Medcem GmbH, Weinfelden, Switzerland), a product consisting of 0.9 g of 1-hydroxyethylidene-1,1-diphosphonic acid (HEDP) powder, with or without high-power sonic activation on debris and smear layer removal.

Methods: Seventy-five mandibular premolars were divided into 5 groups (n=15) and treated with different irrigation protocols: group 1 (D3N), DualRinse HEDP+3% NaOCl without activation; group 2 (D3NA), DualRinse HEDP+3% NaOCl with activation (EDDY, VDW, Munich, Germany) during the final irrigation; group 3 (3NE), 3% NaOCl+17% Ethylenediaminetetracetic acid (EDTA)+3% NaOCl without activation; group 4 (3NEA), 3% NaOCl+17% EDTA+3% NaOCl with activation during the final irrigation; group 5 (NC), negative control group, 0.

Preferred Reporting Items for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in Endodontics (PRIDASE) guidelines: a development protocol.

Diagnostic accuracy studies play an important role in informing clinical practice and patient management, by evaluating the ability of diagnostic testing and imaging to identify the presence or absence of a disease or condition. These studies compare the relative diagnostic strength of the test or device with a reference standard, therefore, guiding clinical decisions on the reliability of the test, the need for further tests, and whether to monitor or treat a particular condition. Inadequate and incomplete reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies can disguise methodological deficiencies and ultimately result in study bias and the inability to translate research findings into daily clinical practice.