Publications by authors named "D K Neupane"
Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to develop a list of items for potential inclusion in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines for network meta-analysis (NMA), scoping reviews (ScRs), and rapid reviews (RRs).
Introduction: The PRISMA extensions for NMA and ScRs were published in 2015 and 2018. However, since then, their methodologies and innovations, including automation, have evolved.
Among the mental health outcomes and disaster types (determined by damage to life, property, long-term consequences, displacement, and unpredictability), floods are associated with anxiety and sleep problems, mudslides with anxiety and mood disturbance, volcanic eruptions with acute stress reactions, and earthquakes with anxiety, depression, and physical complaints. Disasters such as tunnel collapse are unique as it involves the healthy, without loss of personal property or displacement; hence, they can have very different health-related outcomes. In this study, we explore mental health and sleep-related issues in workers rescued from an under-construction collapsed tunnel trapped for 17 days.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe goal of this study is to investigate the efficacy of tea-derived absorbents for the removal of heavy metals from contaminated water. For this, absorbents were prepared from milk tea (MT) waste, Ilam tea (IT) waste, and various types of tea leaves, including Immature (IML), mature (ML), and old leaves (OL). The characterization of the absorbents revealed distinct physical and chemical properties from X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), with varying degrees of effectiveness observed across different absorbent types.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFArticle Synopsis
- The study investigates how using small datasets to select an optimal cutoff score for the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) can lead to inaccurate results.
- Researchers evaluated whether data-driven methods for cutoff selection resulted in scores that were significantly different from the true population optimal score and if these methods produced biased accuracy estimates.
- Findings showed that many small studies frequently failed to identify the correct optimal cutoff score, particularly in smaller samples, leading to an overestimation of test sensitivity.
Comparison of Lintula Score with Modified Alvarado Score for Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis in Adults.
J Nepal Health Res Counc
October 2024
Article Synopsis
- Acute appendicitis is a common surgical emergency where delayed diagnosis can lead to serious complications, making effective diagnostic tools essential.
- A study conducted at Bharatpur Hospital in Nepal evaluated the Modified Alvarado and Lintula scores for diagnosing acute appendicitis among patients over two years.
- The findings showed that the Modified Alvarado Score had high sensitivity (89.2%) and specificity (80.0%), indicating it is a reliable tool for determining the need for appendectomy.