Early cessation of calcineurin inhibitors is feasible post-haploidentical blood stem cell transplant: the ANZHIT 1 study.

Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplant (haplo-HSCT) using posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is appropriate for those who lack matched donors. Most studies using PTCy have been retrospective making conclusions difficult. ANZHIT-1 was a phase 2 study conducted at 6 Australian allogeneic HSCT centers.

Allogeneic haemopoietic cell transplant services in Australia and New Zealand in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic: a report from Australia and New Zealand transplant and cellular therapies.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused major disruption to health systems, with allogeneic haemopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT) services a particularly vulnerable area. Ongoing provision of alloHCT has required dynamic responses at national and local levels. In Australia and New Zealand (ANZ), a high reliance on unrelated donors from overseas registries has posed an additional challenge.

Australasian Trends in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Myelofibrosis in the Molecular Era: A Retrospective Analysis from the Australasian Bone Marrow Transplant Recipient Registry.

To review the updated trends of national practice and outcomes in transplantation to treat myelofibrosis (MF), we retrospectively evaluated 142 patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for primary (n = 94) or secondary (n = 48) MF at an Australian/New Zealand transplantation center between 2006 and 2017. The median duration of follow-up was 51.8 months (range, 3.

The disability-rights perspective within the bioethics agenda.

The life perspectives of persons with disabilities have been neglected in many countries and particularly in lower- and middle-income countries that have fewer resources to adequately address the societal needs of these persons. Bioethics purports normative standards for the way in which we treat with others, and the virtue of care should be at the heart of everyday life. Human rights are norms that aspire to protect all persons everywhere.

Addressing the challenge for expedient ethical review of research in disasters and disease outbreaks.

Guideline 20 of the updated International Ethics Guidelines for Health-related Research Involving Humans (2016) by the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) provides guidance on research in disasters and disease outbreaks against the background of the need to generate knowledge quickly, overcome practical impediments to implementing such research, and the need to maintain public trust. The guideline recommends that research ethics committees could pre-screen study protocols to expedite ethical reviews in a situation of crisis, that pre-arrangements be made regarding data sharing and biomedical sample sharing, and that sponsors and research ethics committees seek to minimize risk to researchers conducting research during a disaster. This paper critiques these recommendations against the background of the findings of a survey of public health officials and chairs of research ethics committees in the Caribbean during 2016, which sought to determine the best template for the expeditious ethical review of research proposals in emergency and epidemic situations in the Caribbean, and whose findings can serve as a model for other low- and middle-income countries.