Publications by authors named "D Bargo"

Objectives: Examine whether data from early access to medicines in the USA can be used to inform National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) health technology assessments (HTA) in oncology.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Oncology-based community and academic treatment centres in the USA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: This study aimed to demonstrate enhanced survival extrapolation methods using electronic health record-derived real-world data (RWD).

Methods: The study population included patients diagnosed of ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer who started first-line treatment with anastrozole or letrozole between November 18, 2014, and November 18, 2015. Two patient cohorts were constructed: a clinical trial cohort from digitized MONARCH-3 clinical trial results and a RWD cohort from a deidentified electronic health record-derived database.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to understand how well Japanese patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis stick to their biologic treatments and how this affects their health care usage.
  • Data was collected from a database over a period of four years, examining both before and after patients started biologic therapy.
  • Results showed that adherence to the biologic adalimumab was higher than infliximab, but infliximab had better long-term persistence; persistent patients had fewer hospitalizations but more outpatient visits compared to nonpersistent ones.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Biologic therapies are often used in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) who are nonresponsive to conventional treatments. However, nonresponse or loss of response to biologics often occurs, leading to dose escalation, combination therapy, and/or treatment switching. We investigated real-world treatment patterns of biologic therapies among patients with UC in the USA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Electronic health records (EHRs) can define real world patient populations with high levels of clinical specificity, potentially addressing some of the shortcomings of other types of real world data (RWD) when informing decisions about the comparative effectiveness of medical technologies. An important but under-recognized concern for EHR-derived RWD, however, is that the rich clinical data permits creation of very homogenous subpopulations from the larger group of eligible patients, thereby reducing the representativeness of the cohort relative to clinical practice. In this article, we discuss the tradeoffs between choosing clinical specificity versus representativeness in population sampling for comparative effectiveness research.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF