Publications by authors named "Cullings H"

Purpose: Epidemiological studies of stochastic radiation health effects such as cancer, meant to estimate risks of the adverse effects as a function of radiation dose, depend largely on estimates of the radiation doses received by the exposed group under study. Those estimates are based on dosimetry that always has uncertainty, which often can be quite substantial. Studies that do not incorporate statistical methods to correct for dosimetric uncertainty may produce biased estimates of risk and incorrect confidence bounds on those estimates.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In this article we review the history of key epidemiological studies of populations exposed to ionizing radiation. We highlight historical and recent findings regarding radiation-associated risks for incidence and mortality of cancer and non-cancer outcomes with emphasis on study design and methods of exposure assessment and dose estimation along with brief consideration of sources of bias for a few of the more important studies. We examine the findings from the epidemiological studies of the Japanese atomic bomb survivors, persons exposed to radiation for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes, those exposed to environmental sources including Chornobyl and other reactor accidents, and occupationally exposed cohorts.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In radiation risk estimation based on the Radiation Effects Research Foundation (RERF) cohort studies, one common analysis is Poisson regression on radiation dose and background and effect modifying variables of an aggregate endpoint such as all solid cancer incidence or all non-cancer mortality. As currently performed, these analyses require selection of a surrogate radiation organ dose, (e.g.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The DS02 dosimetry system, used to assess cancer risks among atomic bomb survivors, employs three simplified body models but lacks accurate representation for fetal organ doses, relying instead on the uterine wall of an adult phantom.
  • To improve accuracy, the RERF Working Group has developed the J45 series of high-resolution voxel phantoms that include various body types from newborns to adults, along with four pregnant female models at different gestational ages.
  • Recent comparisons show that organ doses calculated using these new J45 phantoms, especially in realistic postures like kneeling and lying down, reveal that the DS02 system may overestimate doses by up to 1.45 times for certain exposure scenarios.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Scientists learned about the effects of radiation on unborn babies by studying women who were pregnant during the atomic bomb explosions in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
  • They used special models called phantoms to estimate how much radiation the babies inside these women received at different pregnancy stages.
  • The study found that the previous estimates of radiation exposure were too high, especially for the babies' brains later in pregnancy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - The Radiation Effects Research Foundation (RERF) has updated radiation exposure estimates for Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bomb survivors, introducing the J45 phantom series with better anatomical models for more accurate dosimetry.
  • - The J45 series offers improved details such as age, sex distinctions, and specific organ doses, resulting in significant dose improvements for organs like active marrow, colon, and stomach wall by up to 20%.
  • - Evaluations showed that the updated models, particularly for neutron doses, can double the estimated impacts for certain organs, providing a strong rationale for the incorporation of the J45 phantom series into future dosimetry workflows.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

From 1948 to 1954, the Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission conducted a study of pregnancy outcomes among births to atomic bomb survivors (Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan) who had received radiation doses ranging from 0 Gy to near-lethal levels. Past reports (1956, 1981, and 1990) on the cohort did not identify significant associations of radiation exposure with untoward pregnancy outcomes, such as major congenital malformations, stillbirths, or neonatal deaths, individually or in aggregate. We reexamined the risk of major congenital malformations and perinatal deaths in the children of atomic bomb survivors (n = 71,603) using fully reconstructed data to minimize the potential for bias, using refined estimates of the gonadal dose from Dosimetry System 2002 and refined analytical methods for characterizing dose-response relationships.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Owing to recent advances in computational dosimetry tools, an update is warranted for the dosimetry system for atomic bomb survivors that was established by the Joint U.S.Japan Working Group on the Reassessment of Atomic Bomb Dosimetry in 2002 (DS02).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Dosimetric measurement error is known to potentially bias the magnitude of the dose response, and can also affect the shape of dose response. In this report, generalized relative and absolute rate models are fitted to the latest Japanese atomic bomb survivor solid cancer, leukemia and circulatory disease mortality data (followed from 1950 through 2003), with the latest (DS02R1) dosimetry, using Bayesian techniques to adjust for errors in dose estimates and assessing other model uncertainties. Linear-quadratic models are fitted and used to assess lifetime mortality risks for contemporary UK, USA, French, Russian, Japanese and Chinese populations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The findings from previously published studies have suggested that radiation exposure is associated with increased mortality and incidence of gastric cancer. However, few cohort studies have incorporated risk factors such as Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection or chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Whether low-dose ionizing radiation can cause cancer is a critical and long-debated question in radiation protection. Since the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation report by the National Academies in 2006, new publications from large, well-powered epidemiological studies of low doses have reported positive dose-response relationships. It has been suggested, however, that biases could explain these findings.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Ionizing radiation poses cancer risks, especially at low doses, with new studies suggesting increased cancer risks since 2006, prompting a systematic review to evaluate these risks and consider potential biases.
  • The review included studies with low cumulative doses (under 100 mGy) from 2006 to 2017, focusing on biases like dose errors and confounding factors, and conducted a meta-analysis to quantify the relative risks associated with solid cancers and leukemia.
  • Results showed that a significant number of studies indicated positive excess relative risks (ERRs) for both solid cancers and leukemia, suggesting low-dose ionizing radiation is linked to increased cancer risk, even after accounting for potential biases.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: A monograph systematically evaluating recent evidence on the dose-response relationship between low-dose ionizing radiation exposure and cancer risk required a critical appraisal of dosimetry methods in 26 potentially informative studies.

Methods: The relevant literature included studies published in 2006-2017. Studies comprised case-control and cohort designs examining populations predominantly exposed to sparsely ionizing radiation, mostly from external sources, resulting in average doses of no more than 100 mGy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - The paper introduces a causal mediation analysis approach specifically for nested case-control study designs, utilizing conditional likelihood in conjunction with countermatching schemes.
  • - It compares this new method's effectiveness against traditional mediation analysis using the Cox model on a full cohort while assessing efficiency through simulation studies.
  • - The method is demonstrated using real data from the Adult Health Study on atomic-bomb survivors, showing that it can yield results comparable to those obtained from analyzing the full cohort, making it a valid option for mediation analysis with reduced data.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Radiation exposure to germ cells, specifically spermatogonia and mature oocytes, leads to significant mutations in offspring, as evidenced by whole-genome sequencing.
  • The study found that irradiation (4 Gy of gamma rays) resulted in distinct rates of insertions/deletions (indels) and multisite mutations in both spermatogonia and oocytes among 24 F1 mice.
  • Notably, two types of deletions were identified: small deletions in non-repeat sequences with microhomology and single-nucleotide deletions in mononucleotide repeat sequences, indicating a potential signature of radiation-induced mutations in mammals.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

An important cohort of the atomic bomb survivors are women who were pregnant when exposed to the photon and neutron fields at both Hiroshima and Nagasaki, as well as their children who were exposed . Estimates of organ dose to the developing fetus allow for the development of dose-dependent and gestational age-dependent models of deterministic (e.g.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

When assessing radiation-related risk among the atomic bomb survivors, choices in modeling approach can have an important impact on the results, which are then used to inform radiation protection standards throughout the world. The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki produced a mixed-field radiation exposure from two sources: neutrons and gamma rays. Neutrons are more densely ionizing and cause greater biological damage per unit absorbed dose, resulting in greater relative biological effectiveness (RBE) than gamma rays.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A recent analysis of solid cancer incidence in the Life Span Study of atomic bomb survivors (Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan) found evidence of a nonlinear, upwardly curving radiation dose response among males but not among females. Further analysis of this new and unexpected finding was necessary. We used two approaches to investigate this finding.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Importance: Weight cycling is associated with the risk of mortality from heart disease, but many studies have not distinguished between simple nonlinear (monotone) weight changes and more complex changes that reflect fluctuations.

Objective: To assess whether extreme body weight variation is associated with mortality after controlling for nonlinear weight changes.

Design, Setting, And Participants: In this prospective clinical cohort study, 4796 Japanese atomic bomb survivors were examined in the clinic as part of a biennial health examination and research program.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The article Dose-responses for mortality from cerebrovascular and heart diseases in atomic bomb survivors: 1950-2003, written by Helmut Schöllnberger.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

One of the largest sources of data on radiation exposure in humans is the study of the atomic bomb survivors at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan performed by the Radiation Effects Research Foundation (RERF). As part of their retrospective dosimetry efforts for the atomic bomb survivors, RERF published two core systems: Dosimetry System 1986 (DS86) and Dosimetry System 2002 (DS02). Due to computing limitations at the time, only three stylized phantoms (an infant, child and adult) were used in DS86 and DS02 to represent the entire Japanese population.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF