A regulatory governance perspective on health technology assessment (HTA) in France: the contextual mediation of common functional pressures.

The new regulatory governance perspective has introduced several insights to the study of health technology assessment (HTA): it has broadened the scope for the analysis of HTA; it has provided a more sophisticated account of national diversity and the potential for cross-border policy learning; and, it has dissolved the distinction between HTA assessment and appraisal processes. In this paper, we undertake a qualitative study of the French process for HTA with a view to introducing a fourth insight: that the emergence and continuing function of national agencies for HTA follows a broadly evolutionary pattern in which contextual factors play an important mediating role. We demonstrate that the French process for HTA is characterised by distinctive institutions, processes and evidential requirements.

A regulatory governance perspective on Health Technology Assessment (HTA) in Sweden.

Independent regulatory agencies (IRAs) for Health Technology Assessment (HTA) are a key means by which national governments have responded to the challenge of ensuring equitable public access to a new range of medicines and treatment options within the context of limited national budgets for healthcare. In this paper, we apply a regulatory governance frame to the study of the Swedish process for HTA. Based on qualitative interviews with key institutional stakeholders, we suggest that the major challenge for Swedish IRAs for HTA is successfully communicating nationally produced research outputs to the regional authorities responsible for the delivery of health services.