Objective: This study evaluates whether emergency department septic shock patients without a fever (reported or measured) receive less IV fluids, have decreased antibiotic administration, and suffer increased in-hospital mortality.
Design: This was a secondary analysis of a prospective, observational study of patients with shock.
Setting: The study was conducted in an urban, academic emergency department.
Introduction: Strategies to identify high-risk emergency department (ED) patients often use markedly abnormal vital signs and serum lactate levels. Risk stratifying such patients without using the presence of shock is challenging. The objective of the study is to identify independent predictors of in-hospital adverse outcomes in ED patients with abnormal vital signs or lactate levels, but who are not in shock.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIntroduction: Differentiating shock etiologies is a challenging task in the Emergency Department (ED); even the strongest clinical predictors leave some diagnostic uncertainty. This study sought to establish an evidence base for using clinical covariates in the diagnostic evaluation of septic shock.
Methods: We conducted a prospective, observational study of consecutive ED patients with shock from November 11, 2012 to September 23, 2013.