Publications by authors named "Clio Janssens"

Article Synopsis
  • This study explores how people adjust their cognitive control based on the difficulty of tasks and potential rewards, using fMRI and electrophysiological methods.
  • It identifies specific brain signals, such as the contingent negative variation (CNV) and oscillatory power in theta and alpha bands, which indicate proactive control strategies during challenging tasks.
  • Findings show that more negative CNV, increased theta power, and decreased alpha power occur before difficult calculations, linking these measures to improved performance and confirming that difficulty signals influence cognitive control without involving physical preparation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Stimulus complexity is an important determinant of aesthetic preference. An influential idea is that increases in stimulus complexity lead to increased preference up to an optimal point after which preference decreases (inverted-U pattern). However, whereas some studies indeed observed this pattern, most studies instead showed an increased preference for more complexity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Reward prediction errors (RPEs) are crucial to learning. Whereas these mismatches between reward expectation and reward outcome are known to drive procedural learning, their role in declarative learning remains underexplored. Earlier work from our lab addressed this, and consistently found that signed reward prediction errors (SRPEs; "better-than-expected" signals) boost declarative learning.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Reward prediction errors (RPEs) are thought to drive learning. This has been established in procedural learning (e.g.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Recent associative models of cognitive control hypothesize that cognitive control can be learned (optimized) for task-specific settings via associations between perceptual, motor, and control representations, and, once learned, control can be implemented rapidly. Midfrontal brain areas signal the need for control, and control is subsequently implemented by biasing sensory representations, boosting or suppressing activity in brain areas processing task-relevant or task-irrelevant information. To assess the timescale of this process, we employed EEG.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Optimally recruiting cognitive control is a key factor in efficient task performance. In line with influential cognitive control theories, earlier work assumed that control is relatively slow. We challenge this notion and test whether control also can be implemented more rapidly by investigating the time course of cognitive control.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF