Children with cleft lip and/or palate were assessed for speech, language, phonological awareness (PA), rapid naming (RN) and reading ability using standardized instruments at baseline (T1; = 142, M = 6.14 years, 51% males) and 2-year follow-up (T2; 89% retention, M = 8.38).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjectives: (1) Assess caregiver-reported development in infants born with cleft lip ± alveolus (CL ± A) and cleft lip and palate (CLP); (2) determine factors associated with increased developmental risk; and (3) determine consistency of developmental risk before and after surgery for cleft lip.
Design: Prospective, longitudinal assessment of development. Time (T) 1, prior to lip closure; T2, 2 months post lip closure.
Objective: To determine associations of demographic, morphologic, and treatment protocol parameters with quality of life (QoL), appearance/speech satisfaction, and psychological adjustment.
Design: Observational study utilizing retrospective report of protocol variables and current outcome variables.
Setting: Six North American cleft treatment clinics.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J
February 2024
Objective: To evaluate the sensitivity to change of daily ratings of the comfort (COMF) and behavioral/emotional health (BEH) domains of the Infants with Clefts Observation Outcomes Instrument (iCOO) at 3 time points, and to assess the association of post-surgical interventions on iCOO ratings.
Design: The COMF and BEH domains were completed by caregivers before (T0), immediately after (T1), and 2-months after (T2) cleft lip (CL) surgery. Analyses included descriptive statistics, correlations, -tests, and generalized estimating equations.
This study evaluated the effectiveness of academic screening measures in relation to parent-reported diagnoses. Multicenter, retrospective cohort study including structured interviews, questionnaires, and chart reviews. Six North American cleft centers.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThis observational, multisite cohort study explored health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in children with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P), including interrater agreement and ratings for this group relative to clinical cutoff scores and published means for healthy and chronically ill children. Participants (338 children ages 8-10 years, 45.9% male and their parents, 82.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCaregiver and observer-reported measures are frequently used as outcomes for research on infants and young children who are unable to report on their own health. Our team developed the Infant with Clefts Observation Outcomes Instrument (iCOO) for infants with cleft lip with or without cleft palate. This exploratory study compared test-retest and interrater reliabilities to inform whether differences in caregiver perspective might affect the iCOO.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: We evaluated the measurement properties for item and domain scores of the Infant with Clefts Observation Outcomes Instrument (iCOO).
Design: Cross-sectional (before lip surgery) and longitudinal study (preoperative baseline and 2 days and 2 months after lip surgery).
Setting: Three academic craniofacial centers and national online advertisements.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate possible relationships between number of surgeries and parent ratings of academic functioning among children with isolated oral clefts.
Design: Multicenter, retrospective cohort study including structured interviews, questionnaires, and chart reviews.
Setting: Completion of questionnaires occurred during clinical visits at 6 different cleft centers across North America.
Objective: To develop an outcomes instrument that assesses observations that can be reliably reported by caregivers and can be used to assess health of infants with a cleft lip or cleft lip and cleft palate (CL±P) and impacts of treatments.
Design: Cross-sectional, mixed methods study.
Setting: Caregivers and health-care providers were recruited from 3 academic craniofacial centers and national advertisements.
Objective: To explore, using semistructured qualitative interviews, parent observations of their infant's health as they relate to having a cleft lip or cleft lip and cleft palate (CL±P) and/or associated treatments.
Design: Cross-sectional, qualitative study across 3 sites.
Setting: Parents were recruited from 3 academic craniofacial centers.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J
October 2018
Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of international adoption (IA), age at palatoplasty (PR age), and velopharyngeal sufficiency (VPS) on articulation outcomes.
Design: This was a cross-sectional, prospective, observational study.
Setting: Outpatient hospital clinic.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine whether language skills differed between children with cleft palate or cleft lip and palate (CP±CL) who were adopted into an English-speaking home from a non-English-speaking country (late English exposure [LE]) and children with CP±CL raised from birth in an English-speaking home (early English exposure [EE]).
Method: Children (51 LE, 67 EE), ages 3;0 (years;months) to 9;0, completed the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals (CELF), Preschool Second Edition or Fourth Edition. Linear regression analysis was used to assess the impact of age of adoption and time in an English-speaking home on language skills, as measured by the CELF-P2 and CELF-4.
Cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) are among the most common of all birth defects. Habilitation requires multiple surgeries and other therapies throughout childhood and adolescence. While multidisciplinary care is recommended, there is a great deal of variation in treatment protocols for this condition.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe aim of this study was to identify factors associated with youth satisfaction with surgical procedures performed to address oral cleft or craniofacial conditions (CFCs). It was hypothesized that youth mental health, participation in decision making, perceived consequences of living with a CFC, and coping strategies would be associated with satisfaction with past surgeries. A total of 203 youth between the ages of 11 and 18 years (mean age = 14.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMore adolescents and young adults are requiring facial skeletal surgical procedures. They are vulnerable in emotional development, and the stress of surgery adds to this. Interaction between adolescent patients and caregivers must be assessed in treatment planning for a successful outcome.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF