Objectives: This study examined whether 'personality vulnerability' (i.e., self-critical perfectionism or dependency) predicts the trajectory of change, as well as variability and instability (i.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Case conceptualization is assumed to be an important element in cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) because it describes and explains clients' presentations in ways that inform intervention. However, we do not have a good measure of competence in CBT case conceptualization that can be used to guide training and elucidate mechanisms.
Aims: The current study addresses this gap by describing the development and preliminary psychometric properties of the Collaborative Case Conceptualization - Rating Scale (CCC-RS; Padesky et al.
Clin Psychol Psychother
December 2012
Padesky and Mooney's four-step Strengths-Based cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) model is designed to help clients build positive qualities. This article shows how it can be used to build and strengthen personal resilience. A structured search for client strengths is central to the approach, and methods designed to bring hidden strengths into client awareness are demonstrated through therapist-client dialogues.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: In this study, the authors examined the feasibility and effectiveness of training community therapists to deliver cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for depression.
Method: Participants were therapists (n = 12) and clients (n = 116; mean age = 41 years, 63% women) presenting for treatment of depression at a not-for-profit and designated community mental health center for St. Joseph County, Indiana.
Case conceptualisation is the process of integrating the unique experience of the individual with psychological theory and is often described as a central process in effective therapy. Hence, a key question facing a clinician working from a cognitive behavioural perspective is which theory should be chosen as the basis of the conceptualisation with a particular client? We address this question by first considering the strengths and limitations of the disorder specific and trans-diagnostic approaches. From this, the differences between the approaches are framed as a conundrum or puzzle that is solved through a principle based approach to case conceptualisation that allows clinicians to individualise therapy by selecting and incorporating the most appropriate theory and research.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF