Are Brain Dead Individuals Dead? Grounds for Reasonable Doubt.

According to the biological definition of death, a human body that has not lost the capacity to holistically organize itself is the body of a living human individual. Reasonable doubt against the conclusion that it has lost the capacity exists when the body appears to express it and no evidence to the contrary is sufficient to rule out reasonable doubt against the conclusion that the apparent expression is a true expression (i.e.

The POLST paradigm and form:Facts and analysis.

This white paper, prepared by a working group of the Catholic Medical Association, provides a commentary on a new type of end-of-life document called a POLST form (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) as well as on its model (or "paradigm") for implementation across the United States. After an introductory section reviewing the origin, goals, and standard defenses of the POLST paradigm and form, the paper offers a critical analysis of POLST, including an analysis of the risks that POLST poses to sound clinical and ethical decision-making. The paper ends with several recommendations to help Catholic healthcare professionals and institutions better address the challenges of end-of-life care with alternatives to POLST.

D. Alan Shewmon and the PCBE's White Paper on Brain Death: are brain-dead patients dead?

The December 2008 White Paper (WP) on "Brain Death" published by the President's Council on Bioethics (PCBE) reaffirmed its support for the traditional neurological criteria for human death. It spends considerable time explaining and critiquing what it takes to be the most challenging recent argument opposing the neurological criteria formulated by D. Alan Shewmon, a leading critic of the "whole brain death" standard.

The problem of fetal pain and abortion: toward an ethical consensus for appropriate behavior.

Debate exists over whether fetuses feel pain, and if so what to do about it. Because they cannot provide self-report, certitude on the question cannot be reached. The essay argues that a presumption of reasonable doubt is adequate to inform moral behavior.

A Critique of the National POLST Paradigm through an Analysis of Colorado's New Legislation.

Colorado recently legalized a new document for use in end-of-life care called a Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment (MOST) form. The legislation exempts from liability to homicide laws caregivers who execute MOST orders for the withdrawing or withholding of life-sustaining procedures. But it drops the requirement that patients be terminally ill before they are free to refuse those procedures.

"Other selves": moral and legal proposals regarding the personhood of cryopreserved human embryos.

This essay has two purposes. The first is to argue that our moral duties towards human embryos should be assessed in light of the Golden Rule by asking the normative question, "how would I want to be treated if I were an embryo?" Some reject the proposition "I was an embryo" on the basis that embryos should not be recognized as persons. This essay replies to five common arguments denying the personhood of human embryos: (1) that early human embryos lack ontological individuation; (2) that they are members of the species Homo sapiens but not yet human persons; (3) that the argument for personhood commits the "heap argument" fallacy; (4) that since human procreation in nature is inefficient, human embryos cannot be persons; and (5) the "burning building" scenario proves that all arguments for personhood are irrational or inconsistent.