Objectives: Early physical therapy (PT) with specific stabilization training has been shown to benefit individuals after lumbar spinal surgery but has not been studied in patients after cervical spine surgery. The primary purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between early cervical spine stabilizer (ECS) training and usual care (UC) in patients after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery. The secondary purpose was to determine test-retest reliability of strength and endurance tests of cervical spinal stabilizers in this patient population.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground Context: Although several publications in the last decade have proved equality in safety and efficacy of the total disc replacement (TDR) to the anterior fusion procedure in cervical spine, the claim that TDR may reduce the incidence of adjacent segment disease (ASD) has not been corroborated by clinical evidence.
Purpose: We attempt to predict the true incidence of symptomatic ASD after TDR surgery in the cervical spine at one or two levels at a median follow-up period of 4 years.
Study Design: A total of 763 patients were screened to participate in four different Food and Drug Administration device exemption trials for artificial cervical disc replacement at three collaborating institutions.
Object: Cervical total disc replacement (CTDR) represents a relatively novel procedure intended to address some of the shortcomings associated with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) by preserving motion at the treated level. This prospective, randomized, multicenter study evaluates the safety and efficacy of a new metal-on-metal CTDR implant (Kineflex|C) by comparing it with ACDF in the treatment of single-level spondylosis with radiculopathy.
Methods: The study was a prospective, randomized US FDA Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) pivotal trial conducted at 21 centers across the US.