Objective: We aimed to examine how peripartum contraceptive care quality improvement efforts address or perpetuate reproductive health injustices.
Study Design: We conducted a comparative case study of inpatient postpartum contraceptive care implementation in 2017 to 2018, using key informant interviews at 11 United States hospitals. After our primary analysis revealed tensions between enhancing access to contraceptive care and patient-centeredness, we conducted the current inductive content analysis guided by 4 questions developed post-hoc: (1) What are healthcare workers' aspirations for contraceptive quality improvement programs? (2) What are healthcare workers' biases regarding peripartum contraceptive care delivery? (3) Do care delivery processes center patients' needs? (4) Do healthcare workers recognize and engage with structural inequities?
Results: Seventy-eight key informants (i.
Although reproductive injustices and reproductive health disparities are well-documented in the United States, recent studies have begun to explore the health care professional's role in their perpetuation. We hypothesized that obstetrics and gynecology residents would observe reproductive injustices during their training. Thus, using a national survey, we asked obstetrics and gynecology residents to share clinical cases in which discrimination, bias, inequity, or injustice was involved in a patient's reproductive health care and queried their preparedness to respond.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF: Reproductive justice (RJ) is defined by women of color advocates as the right to have children, not have children and parent children while maintaining reproductive autonomy. In the United States, physicians have been complicit in multiple historical reproductive , involving coercive sterilization of thousands of people of color, low income, and disabilities. Currently, reproductive injustices continue to occur; however, physicians have no formal RJ medical education to address injustices.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF