Publications by authors named "Champion Sebastien"

Background: Despite scarce data, invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) is widely suggested as first-line ventilatory support in cardiogenic shock (CS) patients. We assessed the real-life use of different ventilation strategies in CS and their influence on short and mid-term prognosis.

Methods: FRENSHOCK was a prospective registry including 772 CS patients from 49 centers in France.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is the most severe form of acute heart failure. Discrepancies have been reported between sexes regarding delays, pathways and invasive strategies in CS complicating acute myocardial infarction. However, effect of sex on the prognosis of unselected CS remains controversial.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The effects of pharmacological therapy on cardiogenic shock (CS) survivors have not been extensively studied. Thus, this study investigated the association between guideline-directed heart failure (HF) medical therapy (GDMT) and one-year survival rate in patients who are post-CS.

Methods And Results: FRENSHOCK (French Observatory on the Management of Cardiogenic Shock in 2016) registry was a prospective multicenter observational survey, conducted in metropolitan French intensive care units and intensive cardiac care units.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is the most severe form of heart failure (HF), resulting in high early and long-term mortality. Characteristics of CS secondary to supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) are poorly reported. Based on a large registry of unselected CS, we aimed to compare 1-year outcomes between SVT-triggered and non-SVT-triggered CS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Cardiogenic shock is a rare condition in adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD), making up only 0.9% of cases in a nationwide registry study in France.
  • The study found that ACHD patients were younger and had fewer risk factors for cardiovascular issues compared to non-ACHD patients, but they still experienced a high rate of severe outcomes after one year, similar to non-ACHD patients.
  • Management strategies differed significantly, with ACHD patients more likely to receive catheterizations and device implantations while less likely to use temporary circulatory support or invasive ventilation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This study explored the characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients with active cancer who were admitted for cardiogenic shock, finding that they made up about 6.6% of the 772 enrolled patients.
  • Although active cancer patients had similar initial in-hospital outcomes as non-cancer patients, they required more intensive drug management but received less mechanical support.
  • While both groups had similar 30-day mortality rates, the active cancer group had significantly higher long-term mortality rates at 1 year, indicating that active cancer dramatically impacts survival after initial treatment for cardiogenic shock.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a life-threatening condition carrying poor prognosis, potentially triggered by ventricular arrhythmia (VA). Whether the occurrence of VA as trigger of CS worsens the prognosis compared to non-VA triggers  remains  unclear.  The  aim  of  this  study  was  to  evaluate  1-year  outcomes [mortality, heart transplantation, ventricular assist devices (VAD)] between VA-triggered and non-VA-triggered CS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims: Published data on cardiogenic shock (CS) are scarce and are mostly focused on small registries of selected populations. The aim of this study was to examine the current CS picture and define the independent correlates of 30 day mortality in a large non-selected cohort.

Methods And Results: FRENSHOCK is a prospective multicentre observational survey conducted in metropolitan French intensive care units and intensive cardiac care units between April and October 2016.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • There was a technical error in the original article that affected the code related to the Basir et al. cohort's outcomes.
  • The mis-implementation led to inaccurate information being presented in the article.
  • The characteristics of the cohort mentioned will be corrected and clarified in this updated version.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Catecholamines have been the mainstay of pharmacological treatment of cardiogenic shock (CS). Recently, use of epinephrine has been associated with detrimental outcomes. In the present study we aimed to evaluate the association between epinephrine use and short-term mortality in all-cause CS patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Context: The role of prophylaxis for postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in cardiac surgery is under debate.

Aims: To study the risk factors for PONV after cardiac surgery and the role of betamethasone with or without droperidol for its prevention.

Setting And Design: Randomized open-label controlled study comparing standard care with PONV prophylaxis from February to November 2016.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We describe the case of a peripartum thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura with fulminant cardiogenic shock treated with extracorporeal life support. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura should be considered in the case of thrombotic microangiopathy with several or severe organ involvement and needs emergent treatment with plasmapheresis (with or without rituximab). In the case of cardiac involvement, aggressive treatment should be considered given the high mortality and the potential complete recovery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To model a prognostic score in patients with cardiogenic shock that incorporates catecholamine responsiveness and hemodynamics.

Methods: Assessment of the best accuracy of the score (CRASH score: Catecholamine Refractoriness and Assistance guide based on cardiogenic Shock Hemodynamics) to predict in-hospital mortality and/or extracorporeal life support, based on a retrospective study performed in a medical-surgical intensive care unit. We included 66 patients with cardiogenic shock from various etiologies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF