Correction: Whose shoulders is health research standing on? Determining the key actors and contents of the prevailing biomedical research agenda.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.

Academic dependency: the influence of the prevailing international biomedical research agenda on Argentina's CONICET.

Background: The prevailing health and biomedical sciences (HBMS) research agenda, not only determined by leading academic institutions but also by large pharmaceutical companies, has been shown to prioritize the exploration of novel pharmacological interventions over the study of the socio-environmental factors influencing illness onset and progression. The aim of this investigation is to quantitatively explore whether and to what extent the prevailing international HBMS research agenda and the key actors setting this agenda influence research in non-core countries.

Methods: We used the Web of Science database and the CorText platform to proxy the HBMS research agenda of a prestigious research institution from Latin America: Argentina's National Research Council (CONICET).

Correction: Whose shoulders is health research standing on? Determining the key actors and contents of the prevailing biomedical research agenda.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.

Whose shoulders is health research standing on? Determining the key actors and contents of the prevailing biomedical research agenda.

Background: Conflicts of interest in biomedical research can influence research results and drive research agendas away from public health priorities. Previous agenda-setting studies share two shortfalls: they only account for direct connections between academic institutions and firms, as well as potential bias based on researchers' personal beliefs. This paper's goal is to determine the key actors and contents of the prevailing health and biomedical sciences (HBMS) research agenda, overcoming these shortfalls.