Reliability of online visual and proprioceptive feedback: impact on learning and sensorimotor coding.

Multisensory integration is essential for learning and sensorimotor coding, facilitating learners' adaptation to environmental changes. Recent findings confirm that introducing unreliability into visual feedback enhances the use of motor coding, probably because proprioceptive cues are given greater weight. The present study was designed to test this hypothesis and, more generally, to explore the impact of visual versus proprioceptive cue reliability on learning processes.

Arm cooling selectively impacts sensorimotor control.

The benefits of cold have long been recognized in sport and medicine. However, it also brings costs, which have more rarely been investigated, notably in terms of sensorimotor control. We hypothesized that, in addition to peripheral effects, cold slows down the processing of proprioceptive cues, which has an impact on both feedback and feedforward control.

Use of variable online visual feedback to optimize sensorimotor coding and learning of a motor sequence.

The present study characterized the impact of reliable and/or unreliable online visual feedback and their order of presentation on the coding and learning of a motor sequence. Participants practiced a 12-element motor sequence 200 times. During this acquisition phase, two groups received a single type (i.

Reliability of on-line visual feedback influences learning of continuous motor task of healthy young adults.

A continuous task was used to determine how the reliability of on-line visual feedback during acquisition impacts motor learning. Participants performed a right hand pointing task of a repeated sequence with a visual cursor that was either reliable, moderately unreliable, or largely unreliable. Delayed retention tests were administered 24 h later, as well as intermanual transfer tests (performed with the left hand).

Effects of short-term hand immobilization on anticipatory mechanism for tool use.

The short-term immobilization of a limb such as the right arm can impair sensorimotor mechanisms, which in turn reduces motor control of this arm. However, it is not known whether immobilization also impairs the anticipatory mechanism for tool use without actual enactment. In two experiments, we asked participants to judge how they would use a tool in a particular environment (e.

Visual pursuit biases tactile velocity perception.

During a smooth pursuit eye movement of a target stimulus, a briefly flashed stationary background appears to move in the opposite direction as the eye's motionan effect known as the Filehne illusion. Similar illusions occur in audition, in the vestibular system, and in touch. Recently, we found that the movement of a surface perceived from tactile slip was biased if this surface was sensed with the moving hand.

Short-Term Sensorimotor Deprivation Impacts Feedforward and Feedback Processes of Motor Control.

Sensory loss involves irreversible behavioral and neural changes. Paradigms of short-term limb immobilization mimic deprivation of proprioceptive inputs and motor commands, which occur after the loss of limb use. While several studies have shown that short-term immobilization induced motor control impairments, the origin of such modifications is an open question.

Sensorimotor control and linear visuomotor gains.

In everyday life, we often use graphical interfaces where the visual space is mapped to the motor space with a visuomotor gain called the control display gain. One of the key objectives in the field of Human Computer Interaction is to design this control display gain so as to enhance users' performance. Although the control display gain involved in operating systems has been found to improve users' pointing performance, the reasons for this improvement have not yet been fully elucidated, especially because the control display gains on operating systems are both non-constant and non-linear.

Illusory changes in the perceived speed of motion derived from proprioception and touch.

In vision, the perceived velocity of a moving stimulus differs depending on whether we pursue it with the eyes or not: A stimulus moving across the retina with the eyes stationary is perceived as being faster compared with a stimulus of the same physical speed that the observer pursues with the eyes, while its retinal motion is zero. This effect is known as the Aubert-Fleischl phenomenon. Here, we describe an analog phenomenon in touch.