Objectives: To identify strategies community pharmacists utilized to support equitable vaccination in their communities.
Study Design: Qualitative, descriptive design.
Methods: Key informant interviews were conducted virtually via teleconference using a mix of purposeful and snowball sampling of Pennsylvania community pharmacy personnel who participated in COVID-19 vaccination efforts.
Introduction: The ability to reflect is a key element in preparing pharmacy professionals to meet the challenges of a dynamic health care environment. This mixed-methods study explored the pedagogical benefits of peer feedback by designing, developing, and implementing a peer feedback activity to facilitate reflective practice among pharmacy students.
Methods: Twenty second-year doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) students in a required pharmacotherapy course participated in a systematic peer feedback activity and five of these students volunteered for semi-structured interviews.
Background: The purpose of this study is to gauge pharmacy students' perceptions and attitude towards peer feedback in a pharmacotherapy course.
Methods: An explanatory sequential mixed-method approach with a 20-item electronic survey and semi-structured interviews were used to collect data from students enrolled in a required pharmacotherapy course at a major public university in the southeast United States. A survey design with descriptive statistics were used for the quantitative part and constant comparative approach was used to analyze qualitative data.
To design and develop a series of technology-enhanced, case-based learning activities framed by the Pharmacists' Patient Care Process (PPCP), and to evaluate the impact of these activities on student perceptions and performance. A mixed methods approach was used to generate both quantitative and qualitative data. Survey and focus group interviews were used to analyze student perceptions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF