Training, practice, and career considerations in forensic psychology: results from a field survey of clinical and non-clinical professionals in the United States.

The current field survey describes the identities, training, practices, and careers of 351 U.S. forensic psychologists.

Dementia and competency to stand trial in the United States: A case law review.

Objective: Competency to stand trial (CST) is foundational to the U.S. criminal legal system.

The prevalence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) among people impacted by the criminal legal system: An updated meta-analysis and subgroup analyses.

Objective: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant public health concern and has implications for people directly impacted by the criminal legal system during arrest, conviction, incarceration, and community supervision. This meta-analysis estimated the lifetime prevalence of TBI among people supervised by the criminal legal system across settings.

Hypotheses: Building on previous research, we hypothesized that prevalence estimates would be impacted by methodological, clinical, and demographic factors.

Religious conversion in an older male with longstanding epilepsy.

Religious experiences in epilepsy patients have provoked much interest with suggestions that hyperreligiosity is associated with temporal lobe seizures. Extreme varieties of religious behavior may be more frequent in epilepsy patients during ictal activity or during post-ictal psychotic episodes. We report a 75 year-old man with epilepsy who developed a progressive decline in cognition and behavior following a religious conversion 15 years earlier.

Neuropsychological deficits associated with medical conditions: Implications for psychological services in criminal legal settings.

Criminal legal system-involved populations are disproportionally impacted by chronic health conditions relative to the general population. These discrepancies are thought to be due to both health disparities and increased likelihood to engage in health-compromising behaviors. Medical conditions can significantly influence neuropsychological functioning and, in turn, thinking and behavior relevant to clinical forensic decision-making and psychological practice in criminal legal settings.

Toward generally accepted forensic assessment practices among clinical neuropsychologists: a survey of professional practice and common test use.

Objective: This study investigated professional practice and common test use among clinical neuropsychologists engaging in forensic assessment.

Method: Doctorate-level psychologists active in the practice of neuropsychology and on the INS and NAN membership listings (n = 502) were surveyed about their demographics, professional practice, and common test use. Participants who reported engaging in forensic practice (n = 255) were further surveyed about their forensic practice.

The Neuropsychological Assessment of Justice-Involved Men: Descriptive Analysis, Preliminary Data, and a Case for Group-Specific Norms.

Objective: Neuropsychological expertise has played an increasing role in legal decision-making in criminal contexts. Valid neuropsychological evidence in criminal forensic contexts requires normative data that are representative of justice-involved individuals. Unfortunately, existing normative data appear unlikely to represent justice-involved individuals due to significant demographic and clinical factors specific to this population.

Methodological, ethical, and legal considerations in drug court research.

Since their inception in the late 1980s, drug courts have become the most prevalent specialty court in the United States. A large body of outcome research conducted over the past two decades has demonstrated that drug courts effectively reduce drug use and criminal recidivism, which has led to the rapid proliferation of these courts. Importantly, drug court research has flourished despite the many challenges faced by researchers when working with a vulnerable population of justice-involved substance users.

The role of probation in forensic assertive community treatment.

Objective: Forensic assertive community treatment (FACT) is an adaptation of the assertive community treatment model designed to prevent criminal recidivism through criminal justice collaborations. A national survey was conducted to examine FACT collaborations with probation departments.

Methods: Members of the National Association of County Behavioral Health and Developmental Disability Directors were surveyed to identify FACT programs.