Designing Weights for Quartet-Based Methods When Data are Heterogeneous Across Lineages.

Homogeneity across lineages is a general assumption in phylogenetics according to which nucleotide substitution rates are common to all lineages. Many phylogenetic methods relax this hypothesis but keep a simple enough model to make the process of sequence evolution more tractable. On the other hand, dealing successfully with the general case (heterogeneity of rates across lineages) is one of the key features of phylogenetic reconstruction methods based on algebraic tools.

SAQ: Semi-Algebraic Quartet Reconstruction.

We present the phylogenetic quartet reconstruction method SAQ (Semi-Algebraic Quartet reconstruction). SAQ is consistent with the most general Markov model of nucleotide substitution and, in particular, it allows for rate heterogeneity across lineages. Based on the algebraic and semi-algebraic description of distributions that arise from the general Markov model on a quartet, the method outputs normalized weights for the three trivalent quartets (which can be used as input of quartet-based methods).

Embeddability and rate identifiability of Kimura 2-parameter matrices.

Deciding whether a substitution matrix is embeddable (i.e. the corresponding Markov process has a continuous-time realization) is an open problem even for [Formula: see text] matrices.

Phylogenetic mixtures and linear invariants for equal input models.

The reconstruction of phylogenetic trees from molecular sequence data relies on modelling site substitutions by a Markov process, or a mixture of such processes. In general, allowing mixed processes can result in different tree topologies becoming indistinguishable from the data, even for infinitely long sequences. However, when the underlying Markov process supports linear phylogenetic invariants, then provided these are sufficiently informative, the identifiability of the tree topology can be restored.

Invariant Versus Classical Quartet Inference When Evolution is Heterogeneous Across Sites and Lineages.

One reason why classical phylogenetic reconstruction methods fail to correctly infer the underlying topology is because they assume oversimplified models. In this article, we propose a quartet reconstruction method consistent with the most general Markov model of nucleotide substitution, which can also deal with data coming from mixtures on the same topology. Our proposed method uses phylogenetic invariants and provides a system of weights that can be used as input for quartet-based methods.

EM for phylogenetic topology reconstruction on nonhomogeneous data.

Background: The reconstruction of the phylogenetic tree topology of four taxa is, still nowadays, one of the main challenges in phylogenetics. Its difficulties lie in considering not too restrictive evolutionary models, and correctly dealing with the long-branch attraction problem. The correct reconstruction of 4-taxon trees is crucial for making quartet-based methods work and being able to recover large phylogenies.

The space of phylogenetic mixtures for equivariant models.

Background: The selection of an evolutionary model to best fit given molecular data is usually a heuristic choice. In his seminal book, J. Felsenstein suggested that certain linear equations satisfied by the expected probabilities of patterns observed at the leaves of a phylogenetic tree could be used for model selection.

GenNon-h: generating multiple sequence alignments on nonhomogeneous phylogenetic trees.

Background: A number of software packages are available to generate DNA multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) evolved under continuous-time Markov processes on phylogenetic trees. On the other hand, methods of simulating the DNA MSA directly from the transition matrices do not exist. Moreover, existing software restricts to the time-reversible models and it is not optimized to generate nonhomogeneous data (i.

SPIn: model selection for phylogenetic mixtures via linear invariants.

In phylogenetic inference, an evolutionary model describes the substitution processes along each edge of a phylogenetic tree. Misspecification of the model has important implications for the analysis of phylogenetic data. Conventionally, however, the selection of a suitable evolutionary model is based on heuristics or relies on the choice of an approximate input tree.

Performance of a new invariants method on homogeneous and nonhomogeneous quartet trees.

An attempt to use phylogenetic invariants for tree reconstruction was made at the end of the 80s and the beginning of the 90s by several researchers (the initial idea due to Lake [1987] and Cavender and Felsenstein [1987]). However, the efficiency of methods based on invariants is still in doubt (Huelsenbeck 1995; Jin and Nei 1990). Probably because these methods only used few generators of the set of phylogenetic invariants.