The study evaluates the effectiveness of the non-hyperaemic pressure ratio (NHPR) in assessing coronary stenosis without the need for hyperemic conditions, comparing it to the established method of fractional flow reserve (FFR).
The analysis of data from 700 patients revealed that an NHPR cutoff of 0.93 accurately predicts significant lesions with an overall diagnostic accuracy of approximately 78.84%.
The findings suggest that NHPR may be a useful alternative in specific clinical situations, though FFR remains the gold standard when hyperemia can be induced or is clinically indicated.