Relative source credibility affects the continued influence effect: Evidence of rationality in the CIE.

The Continued Influence Effect (CIE) is the phenomenon that retracted information often continues to influence judgments and inferences. The CIE is rational when the source that retracts the information (the retractor) is less credible than the source that originally presented the information (the informant; Connor Desai et al., 2020).

Remedying the Metamemory Expectancy Illusion in Source Monitoring: Are there Effects on Restudy Choices and Source Memory?

Metamemory monitoring, study behavior, and memory are presumably causally connected. When people misjudge their memory, their study behavior should be biased accordingly. Remedying should debias study behavior and improve memory.

Delaying metamemory judgments corrects the expectancy illusion in source monitoring: The role of fluency and belief.

In schema-based source monitoring, people mistakenly predict better source memory for expected sources (e.g., oven in the kitchen; ), whereas actual source memory is better for unexpected sources (e.