What are the benefits of directed attention within verbal working memory?

Information that is particularly relevant for upcoming behaviour can be prioritised within working memory, by directing attention to it. Receiving focused attention during retention is assumed to be associated with specific benefits, such as increased memory performance and reduced vulnerability to perceptual distractions. This has been demonstrated in visuospatial working memory.

Putting the "Return" Back in the Inhibition of Return Effect in Working Memory.

The inhibition of return effect in perception refers to the observation that one is slower to re-attend a location that was attended right before, compared to a location that was not attended right before. Johnson et al. (2013, Psych.

Accessibility of working memory representations in the focus of attention: Heightened or reduced?

Many researchers agree that information residing in the focus of attention in working memory benefits from a boost in memory strength and activation, as well as heightened accessibility. However, recent studies have questioned this heightened accessibility. More specifically, these recent studies found reduced accessibility for an item in the focus of attention compared to another item in working memory, which was referred to as an "inhibition-of-return-like" effect.

Attentional switching between perception and memory: Examining asymmetrical switch costs.

Attention can be defined as a mechanism for the selection and prioritization of elements among many. When attention is directed to a specific piece of information, this information is assumed to be in the focus of attention. On a day-to-day basis, we need to rely on efficient switching between information we are holding in working memory (internal modality) and information presented in the world around us (external modality).

Inhibition-of-return-like effects in working memory? A preregistered replication study of Johnson . (2013).

The present study concerns a preregistered replication of the study conducted by Johnson . (Johnson 2013 , 1104-1112 (doi:10.1177/0956797612466414)), in which they showed an inhibition-of-return-like effect in working memory.