Background: Screening for prostate cancer is burdened by a high rate of overdiagnosis. The most appropriate algorithm for population-based screening is unknown.
Methods: We invited 37,887 men who were 50 to 60 years of age to undergo regular prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening.
Purpose: Our goal was to analyze results from 22 years of followup in the Göteborg randomized prostate cancer (PC) screening trial.
Materials And Methods: In December 1994, 20,000 men born 1930-1944 were randomly extracted from the Swedish population register and were randomized (1:1) into either a screening group (SG) or to a control group (CG). Men in the SG were repeatedly invited for biennial prostate specific antigen testing up to an average age of 69 years.
Background: Studies have suggested associations between greater age, increased risk of prostate cancer (PC), and higher Gleason score.
Objective: The present study aimed at investigating these associations within the Göteborg-1 randomized, population-based PC screening trial.
Design, Setting, And Participants: The screening arm of the Göteborg-1 screening trial comprises 10000 randomly selected men (aged 50-64 yr at randomization) from the Göteborg region of Sweden.
Background: The Göteborg 2 prostate cancer (PC) screening (G2) trial evaluates screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) followed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in case of elevated PSA levels.
Objective: To assess the safety of using a 2-yr interval in men who were previously screened positive with PSA but had negative MRI or positive MRI with a negative biopsy.
Design, Setting, And Participants: A total of 61 201 men aged 50-60 yr were randomized and 38 366 were invited for screening (years 2015-2020).
Background: The optimal follow-up regimen for men after a benign prostate biopsy remains unknown.
Objective: To investigate long-term outcomes for men after an initial benign prostate biopsy.
Design, Setting, And Participants: All men with a benign biopsy in the first screening round of the Göteborg prostate cancer (PC) screening trial were included.
Purpose: We sought to determine long-term outcomes after deferred radical prostatectomy.
Materials And Methods: The study population consisted of all 132 men with screening detected prostate cancer who underwent deferred radical prostatectomy from January 1, 1995 to December 31, 2014 after active surveillance in the Göteborg Randomized, Population-based Prostate Cancer Screening Trial. The last date of followup was May 15, 2017.
Scand J Urol
February 2018
Objective: This study examined whether previously reported results, indicating that prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening can reduce prostate cancer (PC) mortality regardless of sociodemographic inequality, could be corroborated in an 18 year follow-up.
Materials And Methods: In 1994, 20,000 men aged 50-64 years were randomized from the Göteborg population register to PSA screening or control (1:1) (study ID: ISRCTN54449243). Men in the screening group (n = 9950) were invited for biennial PSA testing up to the median age of 69 years.
Background: Active surveillance (AS) has become a well-accepted and widely used treatment strategy.
Objective: To assess the long-term safety of AS for men with screen-detected prostate cancer (PCa).
Design, Setting, And Participants: All men with screen-detected PCa who had very low-, low-, or intermediate-risk PCa and were managed with AS (January 1, 1995 to December 31, 2014) in the Göteborg screening trial.
Background: Prostate cancer is one of the leading causes of death from malignant disease among men in the developed world. One strategy to decrease the risk of death from this disease is screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA); however, the extent of benefit and harm with such screening is under continuous debate.
Methods: In December, 1994, 20,000 men born between 1930 and 1944, randomly sampled from the population register, were randomised by computer in a 1:1 ratio to either a screening group invited for PSA testing every 2 years (n=10,000) or to a control group not invited (n=10,000).
Background: Strategies of active surveillance (AS) of low-risk screen-detected prostate cancer have emerged, because the balance between survival outcomes and quality of life issues when radically treating these malignancies is disputable. Delay before radical treatment caused by active surveillance may be associated with an impaired chance of curability.
Methods: Men diagnosed with low-risk (T1c/T2; prostate-specific antigen [PSA] = <10.
Pathologists are increasingly exposed to prostate biopsies with small atypical foci, requiring differentiation between adenocarcinoma, atypical small acinar proliferation suspicious for malignancy, and a benign diagnosis. We studied the level of agreement for such atypical foci among experts in urologic pathology and all-round reference pathologists of the European Randomized Screening study of Prostate Cancer (ERSPC). For this purpose, we retrieved 20 prostate biopsies with small (most <1 mm) atypical foci.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe purposes of this study were to evaluate if tumour vascularity by Chalkley counting (TVC) in prostate core biopsies can be a predictor of PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer and to estimate the concordance between the TVC in core biopsies and the subsequently examined prostatectomy specimen. All patients, with Gleason score < or =7 in core biopsy, clinical stage T1 or T2 who had a radical prostatectomy during 1990-1997 at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, were selected as a primary group. Patients with neoadjuvant hormonal therapy were excluded.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe Gleason score (GS) of prostate cancer is calculated by adding primary and secondary Gleason grades with patterns occupying less than 5% of the tumour often not included despite their probable prognostic significance. A modified Gleason score (mGS) comprising primary and tertiary patterns of higher grade has been proposed, but its interobserver variability has yet to be elucidated. Slides from 69 consecutive prostatectomy specimens were circulated among four genitourinary pathologists.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: Percent Gleason grade 4/5 (GG4/5) has been proposed as a predictor of prognosis in prostate cancer and it has been shown to add prognostic information to that given by Gleason score (GS). We recently noted that the interobserver reproducibility of percent GG4/5 in total prostatectomy specimens is at least as good as that of the GS. However, to our knowledge the reproducibility of percent GG4/5 in needle biopsies has not yet been investigated.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: To evaluate whether the free-to-total prostate-specific antigen (F/T-PSA) ratio can be used to differentiate between stage pT2 and pT3 prostate cancer.
Material And Methods: A total of 176 consecutive patients from the Göteborg Screening Study (median T-PSA 4.2 ng/ml) who underwent radical prostatectomy (without neoadjuvant hormonal therapy) were included in the study.
Objective: To evaluate whether initial surveillance followed by prostatectomy impairs pathological stage compared to immediate surgery in men with prostate cancer detected as a result of early screening.
Material And Methods: A total of 26 patients with prostate cancer [T1c-T2, Gleason score <7, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 3-13 ng/ml] who were managed by means of initial surveillance (mean 23.4 months, range 8-55 months) followed by radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) were evaluated.
Purpose: We evaluated whether biennial screening with prostate specific antigen (PSA) only is sufficient to detect prostate cancer while still curable.
Materials And Methods: In Göteborg, Sweden 9,972 men 50 to 65 years old were randomized to PSA screening. During 1995 and 1996 these men were invited for a first PSA screening and invited during 1997 and 1998 for a second screening.
Objective: To study the follow-up of men with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (>3 ng/ml) after one benign set of sextant biopsies. From the Göteborg branch of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).
Method: 456 men with one set of benign sextant biopsies were followed every second year for 4 years with PSA determinations.
Purpose: Recently the percent Gleason grade 4/5 was proposed as a predictor of the outcome of prostate cancer and it has been shown that it adds prognostic information to that given by Gleason score. To our knowledge the interobserver variability of percent Gleason grade 4/5 has not yet been investigated. We assessed the percent Gleason grade 4/5, including the identification of high grade patterns and estimation of the percent tumor area, which is potentially more difficult than conventional Gleason grading.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF