Although the corticobasal syndrome was originally most closely linked with the pathology of corticobasal degeneration, the 2013 Armstrong clinical diagnostic criteria, without the addition of aetiology-specific biomarkers, have limited positive predictive value for identifying corticobasal degeneration pathology in life. Autopsy studies demonstrate considerable pathological heterogeneity in corticobasal syndrome, with corticobasal degeneration pathology accounting for only ∼50% of clinically diagnosed individuals. Individualized disease stage and progression modelling of brain changes in corticobasal syndrome may have utility in predicting this underlying pathological heterogeneity, and in turn improve the design of clinical trials for emerging disease-modifying therapies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCortical atrophy and aggregates of misfolded tau proteins are key hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease. Computational models that simulate the propagation of pathogens between connected brain regions have been used to elucidate mechanistic information about the spread of these disease biomarkers, such as disease epicentres and spreading rates. However, the connectomes that are used as substrates for these models are known to contain modality-specific false positive and false negative connections, influenced by the biases inherent to the different methods for estimating connections in the brain.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: To identify imaging subtypes of the cortico-basal syndrome (CBS) based solely on a data-driven assessment of MRI atrophy patterns, and investigate whether these subtypes provide information on the underlying pathology.
Methods: We applied Subtype and Stage Inference (SuStaIn), a machine learning algorithm that identifies groups of individuals with distinct biomarker progression patterns, to a large cohort of 135 CBS cases (52 had a pathological or biomarker defined diagnosis) and 252 controls. The model was fit using volumetric features extracted from baseline T1-weighted MRI scans and validated using follow-up MRI.
Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) approaches are increasingly being used in dementia research. However, several methodological challenges exist that may limit the insights we can obtain from high-dimensional data and our ability to translate these findings into improved patient outcomes. To improve reproducibility and replicability, researchers should make their well-documented code and modeling pipelines openly available.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF