Background: Cerliponase alfa is a recombinant human tripeptidyl peptidase 1 (TPP1) enzyme replacement therapy for the treatment of neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis type 2 (CLN2 disease), which is caused by mutations in the TPP1 gene. We aimed to determine the long-term safety and efficacy of intracerebroventricular cerliponase alfa in children with CLN2 disease.
Methods: This analysis includes cumulative data from a primary 48-week, single-arm, open-label, multicentre, dose-escalation study (NCT01907087) and the 240-week open-label extension with 6-month safety follow-up, conducted at five hospitals in Germany, Italy, the UK, and the USA.
The 12 years old male patient presented here suffers from neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses 2 (CLN2) (MIM# 204500) and receives intracerebroventricular enzyme replacement therapy (ICV-ERT) every 14 days. After the emergence of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, routine care of children and adolescents with rare chronic diseases has become challenging. Although, in general, children do not develop severe COVID-19, when severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection was detected by polymerase chain reaction-screening examination in our CLN2 patient before hospital admission for ICV-ERT, he was regarded to be at risk.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground/aims: Late-infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis type 2 (CLN2) is a neurodegenerative, blinding lysosomal storage disorder. The purpose of the current study was to characterise the progression of CLN2-associated retinal degeneration in patients under intraventricular enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with cerliponase alfa.
Methods: We analysed visual function, retinal morphology and neuropaediatric data using preferential looking test (PLT), Weill Cornell Batten Scale (WCBS), optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging and the Hamburg Motor-Language late-infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (LINCL) Scale (M-L scale).
Recent retrospective studies suggested that early postoperative infections might be associated with a survival benefit for extremity osteosarcoma patients, but the reported results have been conflicting. The files of 437 patients with a newly diagnosed, high-grade osteosarcoma of the extremities treated at 5 referral centers in Germany and Austria between 1989 and 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. All patients underwent multi-agent chemotherapy and limb-sparing tumor excision, followed by endoprothetic replacement.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF