Transcriptomic Profiling of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Bladder Cancer Consensus Classification Relevance, Molecular Heterogeneity, and Differential Immune Signatures.

Analyses of large transcriptomics data sets of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) have led to a consensus classification. Molecular subtypes of upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUCs) are less known. Our objective was to determine the relevance of the consensus classification in UTUCs by characterizing a novel cohort of surgically treated ≥pT1 tumors.

Proteogenomic Characterization of Bladder Cancer Reveals Sensitivity to Apoptosis Induced by Tumor Necrosis Factor-related Apoptosis-inducing Ligand in FGFR3-mutated Tumors.

Background: Molecular understanding of muscle-invasive (MIBC) and non-muscle-invasive (NMIBC) bladder cancer is currently based primarily on transcriptomic and genomic analyses.

Objective: To conduct proteogenomic analyses to gain insights into bladder cancer (BC) heterogeneity and identify underlying processes specific to tumor subgroups and therapeutic outcomes.

Design, Setting, And Participants: Proteomic data were obtained for 40 MIBC and 23 NMIBC cases for which transcriptomic and genomic data were already available.

Expression-based subtypes define pathologic response to neoadjuvant immune-checkpoint inhibitors in muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Checkpoint immunotherapy (CPI) has increased survival for some patients with advanced-stage bladder cancer (BCa). However, most patients do not respond. Here, we characterized the tumor and immune microenvironment in pre- and post-treatment tumors from the PURE01 neoadjuvant pembrolizumab immunotherapy trial, using a consolidative approach that combined transcriptional and genetic profiling with digital spatial profiling.

Epigenomic mapping identifies an enhancer repertoire that regulates cell identity in bladder cancer through distinct transcription factor networks.

Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (BLCA) is an aggressive disease. Consensus BLCA transcriptomic subtypes have been proposed, with two major Luminal and Basal subgroups, presenting distinct molecular and clinical characteristics. However, how these distinct subtypes are regulated remains unclear.