The theory of reference values: an unfinished symphony.

The history of the theory of reference values can be written as an unfinished symphony. The first movement, allegro con fuoco, played from 1960 to 1980: a mix of themes devoted to the study of biological variability (intra-, inter-individual, short- and long-term), preanalytical conditions, standardization of analytical methods, quality control, statistical tools for deriving reference limits, all of them complex variations developed on a central melody: the new concept of reference values that would replace the notion of normality whose definition was unclear. Additional contributions (multivariate reference values, use of reference limits from broad sets of patient data, drug interferences) conclude the movement on the variability of laboratory tests.

Normality: the unreachable star?

The concept of reference values is widely accepted, but their application has been quite lax over the years. This is due primarily to the difficulty of properly selecting and documenting samples from a reference population. In the absence of a clear description of reference individuals, reference values lose their meaning, are ambiguous at best, and are often confused with decision limits.

Need for revisiting the concept of reference values.

The reference values concept has been adopted by health care professionals, including clinical chemists, laboratory scientists, and clinicians and simultaneously by all the official organizations in charge of the establishment of legislation. But the estimation of reference limits, and the evaluation of biological variability need to be improved at the level of the procedures, which are currently too long and too expensive and not feasible easily for all laboratories. The procedures for obtaining reference values, if we follow the original documents, are complex, and that is the main reason that clinical chemists or diagnostic kit manufacturers have not used them systematically.

Hematopoietic engraftment from a minimal number of apheresis procedures after mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells with chemotherapy and rhG-CSF.

In a cohort of 13 patients, peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) were harvested by apheresis after mobilization with chemotherapy and rhG-CSF. Nine patients who had excellent mobilization were transplanted with PBSC concentrates from a minimal number of apheresis procedures (mean of 1.5, range = 1-3).