Unraveling the complex interplay of sex, endocrinology, and inflammation in post-Injury articular cartilage breakdown through in silico modeling.

The onset of degenerative joint diseases such as post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) are associated with joint injury, biomechanical changes, and synovial biochemical anomalies. Sex and reproductive endocrinology have been emerging as potential risk factors, with epidemiological evidence revealing that female's exhibit higher PTOA risk and poorer outcomes post-injury compared to males. Sex hormones, including estradiol, progesterone, and testosterone, have been shown to regulate inflammatory signaling in immune and synovial cells, yet their collective impact on injury-induced joint inflammation and catabolism is poorly understood.

How bad becomes good: A neurocomputational model of affect-informed choice.

People often draw on their current affective experience to inform their decisions, yet little is known about the underlying mechanisms of this process. Understanding them has important implications for many big questions in both the affective and decision sciences. Do the same neural circuits that generate affect generate value? What differentiates people who have greater contextual flexibility in their reliance on affect? Do affective choices invoke processes that are distinct from less affective choices? To investigate these questions, we developed a neurocomputational model of affect-informed choice, in which people convert subjective affect into context-sensitive decision value through a process of weighted evidence accumulation.

Body mass index-dependent shifts along large-scale gradients in human cortical organization explain dietary regulatory success.

Making healthy dietary choices is essential for keeping weight within a normal range. Yet many people struggle with dietary self-control despite good intentions. What distinguishes neural processing in those who succeed or fail to implement healthy eating goals? Does this vary by weight status? To examine these questions, we utilized an analytical framework of gradients that characterize systematic spatial patterns of large-scale neural activity, which have the advantage of considering the entire suite of processes subserving self-control and potential regulatory tactics at the whole-brain level.

When expert predictions fail.

We examine the opportunities and challenges of expert judgment in the social sciences, scrutinizing the way social scientists make predictions. While social scientists show above-chance accuracy in predicting laboratory-based phenomena, they often struggle to predict real-world societal changes. We argue that most causal models used in social sciences are oversimplified, confuse levels of analysis to which a model applies, misalign the nature of the model with the nature of the phenomena, and fail to consider factors beyond the scientist's pet theory.

A neurocomputational account of the link between social perception and social action.

People selectively help others based on perceptions of their merit or need. Here, we develop a neurocomputational account of how these social perceptions translate into social choice. Using a novel fMRI social perception task, we show that both merit and need perceptions recruited the brain's social inference network.