On the flexibility of strategies for center estimation.

When subjects are asked to indicate the center of a spatially distributed stimulus, the features that control their responses tend to vary (1) across subjects and (2) as stimulus properties are altered. Here we ask: can subjects bring these different response tendencies under top-down control? In each of three tasks, all using briefly displayed, Gaussian dot-clouds, subjects were trained to perform different center-estimation responses. In the "mass task," the target was the centroid of the dots.

Inadequate pitch-difference sensitivity prevents half of all listeners from discriminating major vs minor tone sequences.

Substantial evidence suggests that sensitivity to the difference between the major vs minor musical scales may be bimodally distributed. Much of this evidence comes from experiments using the "3-task." On each trial in the 3-task, the listener hears a rapid, random sequence of tones containing equal numbers of notes of either a G major or G minor triad and strives (with feedback) to judge which type of "tone-scramble" it was.

Color scrambles reveal red and green half-wave linear mechanisms plus a mechanism selective for low chromatic contrast.

This paper introduces a new method to determine how subjects make discriminations among red-green texture stimuli. More specifically, the method determines (1) the number of mechanisms in human vision sensitive to lights that vary along the constant-S cardinal axis (cSCA) of DKL space and (2) the sensitivity of each mechanism to cSCA lights. Each of five subjects was tested in four, separately-blocked tasks.

The density effect in centroid estimation is blind to contrast polarity.

Human vision is highly efficient in estimating the centroids of spatially scattered items. However, the processes underlying this remarkable skill remain poorly understood. A salient fact is that in estimating the centroids of dot-clouds, observers underweight densely packed dots relative to isolated dots; thus, when an observer estimates the centroid of a dot cloud, the weight exerted on the subject's response by a given dot tends to be suppressed by other dots near it.

How rests and cyclic sequences influence performance in tone-scramble tasks.

When classifying major versus minor tone-scrambles (random sequences of pure tones), most listeners (70%) perform at chance while the remaining listeners perform nearly perfectly. The current study investigated whether inserting rests and cyclic sequences into the stimuli could heighten sensitivity in such tasks. In separate blocks, listeners classified tone-scramble variants as major versus minor ("3" task) or fourth versus tritone ("4" task).