[Screening for Down syndrome using first-trimester combined screening followed by second trimester ultrasound examination in an unselected population].

Background: Recent studies have reported the efficacy of first trimester combined screening for Down Syndrome based on maternal age, serum markers (human chorionic gonadotropin, pregnancy-associated plasma protein A), and ultrasound measurement of fetal nuchal translucency. However, those do not incorporate the value of the widely accepted routine 20-22 week anomaly scan.

Study Design: We carried out a multi-centre, interventional study in the unselected population of a single health authority in order to assess the performance of first trimester combined screening, followed by routine second trimester ultrasound examination and/or screening by maternal serum markers (free beta-hCG and alpha-fetoprotein measurement or total hCG, alpha-fetoprotein and unconjugated estriol measurement) when incidentally performed.

Screening for Down syndrome using first-trimester combined screening followed by second-trimester ultrasound examination in an unselected population.

Objective: Recent studies have reported the efficacy of first-trimester combined screening for Down syndrome based on maternal age, serum markers (human chorionic gonadotropin, pregnancy-associated plasma protein A), and ultrasound measurement of fetal nuchal translucency. However, those do not incorporate the value of the widely accepted routine 20-22 weeks' anomaly scan.

Study Design: We carried out a multicenter, interventional study in the unselected population of a single health authority in order to assess the performance of first-trimester combined screening, followed by routine second trimester ultrasound examination and/or screening by maternal serum markers (free beta-hCG and alpha-fetoprotein measurement or total hCG, alpha-fetoprotein, and unconjugated estriol measurement) when incidentally performed.

[Secondary prevention of myocardial infarction in the Ile de France].

This enquiry was carried out to evaluate the measures of secondary prevention at 6 months and over of myocardial infarction in the ile de France region with respect to the recommendations of scientific societies and results of large scale therapeutic trials. A questionnaire was completed for the 1,215 patients selected from data obtained from the hospital discharge summary, interrogation and examination of the patient, and a telephone conversation with the attending physician. The data covered cardiovascular risk factors, the main clinical parameters, the results of biological tests and investigations carried out for risk stratification, plus different elements of therapeutic management.