The Social Report (SR) is a form of measurement and reporting, transparency, and communication, essential for sharing decisions, activities, and the value an institution generates with stakeholders from a social responsibility perspective. It is a useful tool for screening programmes to understand their objectives and structure, assess their effectiveness, and promote informed participation by citizens and stakeholders.This contribution explores the implementation of the SR in oncological screening programmes - a project conducted in the CCM 2019 Programme 'Guidelines for Social Reporting of Screening Programmes', coordinated by the Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPRO) in Tuscany Region in collaboration with the Centre for Oncological Screenings of Reggio Emilia (Emilia-Romagna Region) and the Population Screening Programmes Service of ATS Valpadana (Lombardy Region) - conducted between 2020 and 2022.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHereditary breast/ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome is caused by the inheritance of monoallelic germline BRCA1/2 gene mutations. If BRCA1/2 mutation carriers are identified before the disease develops, effective actions against HBOC can be taken, including intensive screening, risk-reducing mastectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy, and risk-reducing medications. The Italian National Prevention Plan mandates the creation of regional BRCA genetic testing programmes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: This study quantifies the impact on budget and cost per health benefit of implementing digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in place of digital mammography (DM) for breast cancer screening among asymptomatic women in Italy.
Methods: A budget impact analysis and a cost consequence analysis were conducted using parameters from the MAITA project and literature. The study considered four scenarios for DBT implementation, i.
Purpose: We present a comprehensive investigation into the organizational, social, and ethical impact of implementing digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) as a primary test for breast cancer screening in Italy. The analyses aimed to assess the feasibility of DBT specifically for all women aged 45-74, women aged 45-49 only, or those with dense breasts only.
Methods: Questions were framed according to the European Network of Health Technology Assessment (EuNetHTA) Screening Core Model to produce evidence for the resources, equity, acceptability, and feasibility domains of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) decision framework.
Aim: The analyses here reported aim to compare the screening performance of digital tomosynthesis (DBT) versus mammography (DM).
Methods: MAITA is a consortium of four Italian trials, REtomo, Proteus, Impeto, and MAITA trial. The trials adopted a two-arm randomised design comparing DBT plus DM (REtomo and Proteus) or synthetic-2D (Impeto and MAITA trial) versus DM; multiple vendors were included.