Development, Use, and Validation of (Q)SARs for Predicting Genotoxicity and Carcinogenicity: Experiences from Italian National Institute of Health Activities.

In silico approaches are now increasingly accepted in several areas of toxicology to rapidly assess chemical hazard without the need for animal testing. Among in silico tools, quantitative and qualitative structure-activity approaches ((Q)SARs) are the most typically applied methods to predict hazard in the absence of experimental data. This paper provides an overview of different protocols that can be applied while dealing with (Q)SARs in different scenarios, namely, (Q)SAR development, use, and validation.

A template wizard for the cocreation of machine-readable data-reporting to harmonize the evaluation of (nano)materials.

Making research data findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable (FAIR) is typically hampered by a lack of skills in technical aspects of data management by data generators and a lack of resources. We developed a Template Wizard for researchers to easily create templates suitable for consistently capturing data and metadata from their experiments. The templates are easy to use and enable the compilation of machine-readable metadata to accompany data generation and align them to existing community standards and databases, such as eNanoMapper, streamlining the adoption of the FAIR principles.

Evaluation of QSAR models for predicting mutagenicity: outcome of the Second Ames/QSAR international challenge project.

Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models are powerful in silico tools for predicting the mutagenicity of unstable compounds, impurities and metabolites that are difficult to examine using the Ames test. Ideally, Ames/QSAR models for regulatory use should demonstrate high sensitivity, low false-negative rate and wide coverage of chemical space. To promote superior model development, the Division of Genetics and Mutagenesis, National Institute of Health Sciences, Japan (DGM/NIHS), conducted the Second Ames/QSAR International Challenge Project (2020-2022) as a successor to the First Project (2014-2017), with 21 teams from 11 countries participating.

Current status and future challenges of genotoxicity OECD Test Guidelines for nanomaterials: a workshop report.

Genotoxicity testing for nanomaterials remains challenging as standard testing approaches require some adaptation, and further development of nano-specific OECD Test Guidelines (TGs) and Guidance Documents (GDs) are needed. However, the field of genotoxicology continues to progress and new approach methodologies (NAMs) are being developed that could provide relevant information on the range of mechanisms of genotoxic action that may be imparted by nanomaterials. There is a recognition of the need for implementation of new and/or adapted OECD TGs, new OECD GDs, and utilization of NAMs within a genotoxicity testing framework for nanomaterials.