Background: A phase II study to evaluate the efficacy, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of oral or intravenous vinorelbine (VRL) plus cisplatin (CDDP) in Chinese patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Methods: One hundred and thirty-one patients were randomised to oral VRL 60 mg/m (arm A) or intravenous VRL 25 mg/m (arm B) on days 1 and 8, plus CDDP 80 mg/m on day 1 (both arms). VRL was increased to 80 mg/m (arm A) or 30 mg/m (arm B) in cycles 2-4 in the absence of toxicity.
Background: This phase II trial was performed to assess the activity and safety of the cisplatin and vinorelbine combination in patients with advanced cervical carcinoma.
Patients And Methods: Forty-two patients with advanced cervical cancer were included in the study to receive vinorelbine at 30 mg/m2 on d 1 and d 8 and cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1 every 4 weeks.
Results: Thirty-seven patients were evaluable for response and 40 patients for tolerance.
Purpose: The objective of this trial was to compare two vinorelbine-based doublets with carboplatin (CBDCA-VC) or with gemcitabine (VG) in patients with stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Patients And Methods: A total of 316 patients with advanced NSCLC previously untreated were randomized to either vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2) D1,8 with carboplatin AUC 5 D1 (VC) or vinorelbine 25mg/m(2) with gemcitabine (VG) 1000 mg/m(2) both given D1,8 every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was response rate with secondary parameters being survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tolerance and clinical benefit.
Vinorelbine intravenously (i.v.) demonstrated its efficacy and tolerability in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, including elderly subjects.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: The standard doublet, vinorelbine-cisplatin, was compared with a triplet of vinorelbine-ifosfamide-cisplatin, in terms of survival, in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Patients And Methods: From February 1998 to June 1999, 259 chemonaïve patients entered the study and were randomised to receive either vinorelbine-cisplatin (NP; vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15 with cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on day 1) or vinorelbine-ifosfamide-cisplatin (NIP; vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, ifosfamide 3 g/m(2) on day 1 and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 1), with both regimens being repeated every 3 weeks. All patients had stage IV or relapsed disease and a performance score of 0 or 1.