Background: Many worldwide regulatory authorities recommend regular surveillance of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients given high failure rates. However, concerns have been raised about whether such regular surveillance, which includes asymptomatic patients, is evidence-based and cost-effective. We determined: (1) the cost of implementing the 2015 MHRA surveillance in "at-risk" Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) patients; and (2) how many asymptomatic hips with adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD) would have been missed without patient recall.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWe investigated whether blood metal ions could effectively identify bilateral metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients at risk of adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD). Whole blood metal ions were sampled in 50 patients with bilateral 36mm Corail-Pinnacle THAs. Patients were divided into ARMD (n=10) and non-ARMD groups (n=40), with optimal ion thresholds for identifying ARMD determined using receiver operating characteristic analysis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFApelin agonism causes systemic vasodilatation and increased cardiac contractility in humans, and improves pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in animal models. Here, the authors examined the short-term pulmonary hemodynamic effects of systemic apelin infusion in patients with PAH. In a double-blind randomized crossover study, 19 patients with PAH received intravenous (Pyr)apelin-13 and matched saline placebo during invasive right heart catheterization.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAims: We investigated whether blood metal ion levels could effectively identify patients with bilateral Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) implants who have adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD).
Patients And Methods: Metal ion levels in whole blood were measured in 185 patients with bilateral BHRs. Patients were divided into those with ARMD who either had undergone a revision for ARMD or had ARMD on imaging (n = 30), and those without ARMD (n = 155).
Background: We investigated whether blood metal ions could effectively identify patients with metal-on-metal hip implants with two common designs (Birmingham Hip Resurfacing [BHR] and Corail-Pinnacle) who were at risk of adverse reactions to metal debris.
Methods: This single-center, prospective study involved 598 patients with unilateral hip implants (309 patients with the BHR implant and 289 patients with the Corail-Pinnacle implant) undergoing whole blood metal ion sampling at a mean time of 6.9 years.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl
February 2016
Introduction: We assessed changes in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties (MoMHAs) after repeat ultrasound examination.
Methods: This retrospective, single-centre cohort study involved all patients undergoing two ultrasound examinations of the same MoMHA. Between 2010 and 2014, 96 ultrasound examinations were performed in 48 MoMHAs (mean time between scans = 1.
Purpose: To determine whether gender, femoral head size, acetabular inclination, and time since surgery predicted high blood metal ion concentrations following Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR).
Methods: BHR patients with unilateral bearings at one specialist centre with blood cobalt and chromium concentrations measured up to May 2013 were included. This comprised a mixed (at-risk) group including symptomatic patients and asymptomatic individuals with specific clinical and/or radiological findings.
Purpose: Most factors considered to affect blood metal ions following metal-on-metal hip replacement are based on hip resurfacing patients. The study aims were to determine which factors affect blood metal ion concentrations following metal-on-metal total hip replacement (MoM THR).
Methods: All unilateral MoM THR patients at one centre with whole-blood cobalt (Co) and chromium (Cr) concentrations measured up to May 2013 were included.
Health Bull (Edinb)
September 1978