Publications by authors named "Bonnie P Youmans"

Balanced bacterial communities within the gastrointestinal (GI) tract of animals are a key component of gut health, resulting in optimal performance and the prevention of disease. The purpose of this study was to characterize the commercial pig's baseline bacterial microbiome over time and across anatomical site. Several anatomical sites (duodenum/jejunum, ileum, cecum, and colon) were examined across multiple ages (days 0, 10, 21, 33, 62, 84, and market) for bacterial microbiome structure using 16S rRNA V4 region sequencing with Illumina MiSeq.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Defining the baseline bacterial microbiome is critical to understanding its relationship with health and disease. In broiler chickens, the core microbiome and its possible relationships with health and disease have been difficult to define, due to high variability between birds and flocks. Presented here are data from a large, comprehensive microbiota-based study in commercial broilers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • * The study is the first to analyze gut bacteria in travelers who developed diarrhea due to specific pathogens (ETEC and NoV) and those without identifiable pathogens, compared to healthy travelers.
  • * A notable finding was a dysbiotic gut microbiome with high Firmicutes:Bacteroidetes ratios in those with diarrhea, indicating that even healthy travelers exhibit microbiome characteristics typical of dysbiosis, potentially related to traveling.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC), the leading bacterial pathogen of travelers' diarrhea, is routinely detected by an established DNA hybridization protocol that is neither sensitive nor quantitative. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assays that detect the ETEC toxin genes eltA, sta1, and sta2 in clinical stool samples were developed and tested using donor stool inoculated with known quantities of ETEC bacteria. The sensitivity of the qPCR assays is 89%, compared with 22% for the DNA hybridization assay, and the limits of detection are 10,000-fold lower than the DNA hybridization assays performed in parallel.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF