Aims: Older patients in particular suffer from adverse drug reactions (ADR) when presenting in the emergency department. We aimed to characterise the phenotype of those ADRs, to be able to recognise an ADR in older patients.
Methods: Cases of ADRs in emergency departments collected within the multicentre prospective observational study (ADRED) were analysed (n = 2215).
Purpose: Adverse drug reactions (ADR) account for 5 to 7% of emergency department (ED) consultations. We aimed to assess medication risk profiles for ADRs leading to ED visits.
Methods: We analysed medication intake and patient demographics in a prospective multi-centre observational study collecting ADR cases in four large EDs in Germany.
Background: Adverse drug reactions (ADR) are a common reason for emergency room visits and for hospitalization. An ADR is said to have occurred when the patient's symptoms and signs are considered to be possibly, probably, or definitely related to the intake of a drug.
Methods: In four large hospital emergency departments, one in each of four German cities ( Ulm, Fürth, Bonn, and Stuttgart), the percentage of suspected ADR cases among all patients presenting to the emergency room was determined during a 30-day period of observation.
Background: Adverse drug events (ADE) involving or not involving medication errors (ME) are common, but frequently remain undetected as such. Presently, the majority of available clinical decision support systems (CDSS) relies mostly on coded medication data for the generation of drug alerts. It was the aim of our study to identify the key types of data required for the adequate detection and classification of adverse drug events (ADE) and medication errors (ME) in patients presenting at an emergency department (ED).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf
February 2015
Purpose: Several economic evaluations of adverse drug events (ADEs) exist, but the underlying methodology has not been standardized so far. The aim of the study was to combine prospective, intensive pharmacovigilance methods, and standardized accounting data to calculate direct costs of community-acquired ADEs (caADEs) contributing to emergency department (ED) admission and subsequent hospitalization.
Methods: A prospective observational study with three phases extending over 2 years was implemented in a 749 bed tertiary care hospital with an annual ED census of approximately 45 000 patients.
Purpose: Adverse drug events (ADE) and medication errors (ME) are common causes of morbidity in patients presenting at emergency departments (ED). Recognition of ADE as being drug related and prevention of ME are key to enhancing pharmacotherapy safety in ED. We assessed the applicability of the Pareto principle (~80 % of effects result from 20 % of causes) to address locally relevant problems of drug therapy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAims: The incidence of clinical events related to medication errors and/or adverse drug reactions reported in the literature varies by a degree that cannot solely be explained by the clinical setting, the varying scrutiny of investigators or varying definitions of drug-related events. Our hypothesis was that the individual complexity of many clinical cases may pose relevant limitations for current definitions and algorithms used to identify, classify and count adverse drug-related events.
Methods: Based on clinical cases derived from an observational study we identified and classified common clinical problems that cannot be adequately characterized by the currently used definitions and algorithms.
Aims: The aim was to improve medication safety in an emergency department (ED) by enhancing the integration and presentation of safety information for drug therapy.
Methods: Based on an evaluation of safety of drug therapy issues in the ED and a review of computer-assisted intervention technologies we redesigned an electronic case sheet and implemented computer-assisted interventions into the routine work flow. We devised a four step system of alerts, and facilitated access to different levels of drug information.
Background: Although usage and acceptance are important factors for a successful implementation of clinical decision support systems for medication, most studies only concentrate on their design and outcome. Our objective was to comparatively investigate a set of traditional medication safety measures such as medication safety training for physicians, paper-based posters and checklists concerning potential medication problems versus the additional benefit of a computer-assisted medication check. We concentrated on usage, acceptance and suitability of such interventions in a busy emergency department (ED) of a 749 bed acute tertiary care hospital.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Lists of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) for the elderly, such as the German PRISCUS list, have been published as expert recommendations with the aim of improving drug safety for this patient group. In this study, we tried to determine how often adverse drug events occur in the emergency department and what role PRISCUS medications might play in these events.
Methods: We prospectively reviewed the medical records of 752 patients who were treated in the emergency department (ED) of a level III hospital in Germany for adverse drug events due to medication errors (MEs) and for adverse drug reactions (ADRs).