Background: Research is needed to understand and address barriers to risk management for women at high (≥20% lifetime) risk for breast cancer, but recruiting this population for research studies is challenging.
Objective: This paper compares a variety of recruitment strategies used for a cross-sectional, observational study of high-risk women.
Methods: Eligible participants were assigned female at birth, aged 25-85 years, English-speaking, living in the United States, and at high risk for breast cancer as defined by the American College of Radiology.
Purpose: Women with greater than 20-25% lifetime breast cancer risk are recommended to have breast cancer screening with annual mammogram and supplemental breast MRI. However, few women follow these screening recommendations. The objective of this study was to identify barriers and facilitators of screening among women at high risk for breast cancer, guided by the Health Services Utilization Model (HSUM).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Am Coll Radiol
June 2024
Early detection of breast cancer from regular screening substantially reduces breast cancer mortality and morbidity. Multiple different imaging modalities may be used to screen for breast cancer. Screening recommendations differ based on an individual's risk of developing breast cancer.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Am Coll Radiol
November 2023
This document discusses the appropriate initial imaging in both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with breast implants. For asymptomatic patients with saline implants, no imaging is recommended. If concern for rupture exists, ultrasound is usually appropriate though saline rupture is often clinically evident.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Natl Compr Canc Netw
September 2023
Background: Annual screening breast MRI is recommended for women at high (≥ 20% lifetime) breast cancer risk, but is underutilized. Guided by the Health Services Utilization Model (HSUM), we assessed factors associated with screening breast MRI among high-risk women.
Methods: From August 2020-January 2021, we recruited an online convenience sample of high-risk women ages 25-85 (N = 232).
Palpable masses in women are the most common symptom associated with breast cancer. This document reviews and evaluates the current evidence for imaging recommendations of palpable masses in women less than 30 to over 40 years of age. There is also a review of several different scenarios and recommendations after initial imaging.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: To quantitatively evaluate intratumoral habitats on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) breast MRI to predict pathologic breast cancer response to stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR).
Methods: Participants underwent SABR treatment (28.5 Gy x3), baseline and post-SABR MRI, and breast-conserving surgery for ER/PR+ HER2- breast cancer.
Given that 20% to 40% of women who have percutaneous breast biopsy subsequently undergo breast surgery, knowledge of imaging women with a history of benign (including high-risk) disease or breast cancer is important. For women who had surgery for nonmalignant pathology, the surveillance recommendations are determined by their overall risk. Higher-than-average risk women with a history of benign surgery may require screening mammography starting at an earlier age before 40 and may benefit from screening MRI.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: While breast imaging such as full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis have helped to reduced breast cancer mortality, issues with low specificity exist resulting in unnecessary biopsies. The fundamental information used in diagnostic decisions are primarily based in lesion morphology. We explore a dual-energy compositional breast imaging technique known as three-compartment breast (3CB) to show how the addition of compositional information improves malignancy detection.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFor women with genetic risk of breast cancer, the addition of screening breast MRI to mammography has become a standard. The order and interval of annual imaging can be variable among providers. To evaluate the clinical implications related to the timing, we conducted a chart review on a cohort of women ( = 276) with high-risk (, , , and ) and moderate high-risk ( and ) predisposition to breast cancer in a 48-month follow up.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBreast cancer screening recommendations for transgender and gender nonconforming individuals are based on the sex assigned at birth, risk factors, and use of exogenous hormones. Insufficient evidence exists to determine whether transgender people undergoing hormone therapy have an overall lower, average, or higher risk of developing breast cancer compared to birth-sex controls. Furthermore, there are no longitudinal studies evaluating the efficacy of breast cancer screening in the transgender population.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAJR Am J Roentgenol
November 2021
Objective: This study evaluates breast MRI response of ER/PR+ HER2- breast tumors to pre-operative SABR with pathologic response correlation.
Methods: Women enrolled in a phase 2 single institution trial of SABR for ER/PR+ HER2- breast cancer were retrospectively evaluated for radiologic-pathologic correlation of tumor response. These patients underwent baseline breast MRI, SABR (28.
Supplemental screening breast MRI is recommended for women with an estimated lifetime risk of breast cancer of greater than 20-25%. The performance of risk prediction models varies for each individual and across groups of women. The present study investigates the concordance of three breast cancer risk prediction models among women presenting for screening mammography.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI provides both morphological and functional information regarding breast tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The purpose of this retrospective study is to test if prediction models combining multiple MRI features outperform models with single features. Four features were quantitatively calculated in each MRI exam: functional tumor volume, longest diameter, sphericity, and contralateral background parenchymal enhancement.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: The Enhancing Quality Using the Inspection Program (EQUIP) initiative was launched to improve clinical image quality. The purpose of this study was to determine if the implementation of the EQUIP reporting system resulted in an increased number of extra views performed at the technologists' discretion during screening mammography.
Materials And Methods: Following IRB approval at a single comprehensive cancer center, patients who underwent screening mammography with combination full-field digital mammography plus digital breast tomosynthesis during a 6-month period before (January 2017 to June 2017) and after (January 2018 to June 2018) EQUIP implementation were identified.
J Am Coll Radiol
November 2020
Mastectomy may be performed to treat breast cancer or as a prophylactic approach in women with a high risk of developing breast cancer. In addition, mastectomies may be performed with or without reconstruction. Reconstruction approaches differ and may be autologous, involving a transfer of tissue (skin, subcutaneous fat, and muscle) from other parts of the body to the chest wall.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHigher categories of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) increase breast cancer risk. However, current clinical BPE categorization is subjective. Using a semiautomated segmentation algorithm, we calculated quantitative BPE measures and investigated the utility of individual features and feature pairs in significantly predicting subsequent breast cancer risk compared with radiologist-assigned BPE category.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the utility of routine axillary ultrasound surveillance in asymptomatic T1 or T2 breast cancer patients with 1 to 2 positive axillary nodes that did not undergo axillary lymph node dissection.
Methods: A retrospective review of our institutional database identified axillary and breast ultrasound examinations performed between February 1, 2011, and August 31, 2017, in asymptomatic T1 or T2 breast cancer patients with 1 to 2 positive axillary nodes that did not undergo axillary lymph node dissection. From the electronic medical record, patient demographics, imaging data, pathology results, and surgical reports were extracted.
Objective: The objective of our study was to compare the supplemental cancer yield and performance of breast MRI in women at higher-than-average risk for breast cancer after negative 2D full-field digital mammography (FFDM) or negative digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT).
Materials And Methods: Retrospective review identified 4418 screening breast MRI examinations: 2291 were performed from January 2010 through January 2012 of patients with a negative FFDM examination in the 12 months before MRI (FFDM group), and 2127 were performed from January 2013 through January 2015 of patients with a negative DBT examination in the 12 months before MRI (DBT group). Screening indications included genetic predisposition, personal history of breast cancer or high-risk lesion, prior chest irradiation, family history, or other risk factors conferring a lifetime risk of greater than 20%.