Evaluation of intramuscular fosphenytoin vs intravenous phenytoin loading in the ED.

Objective: A comparison of length of stay in an emergency department (ED) after loading patients at risk for seizures with either intravenous (IV) phenytoin or intramuscular (IM) fosphenytoin was studied.

Methods: This was a retrospective observational cohort study that was conducted over a 24-month period in an academic teaching hospital (693 beds). Patients included were 18 years or older, discharged from the ED without hospital admission, and loaded with either IV phenytoin or IM fosphenytoin.

Beta1-adrenergic receptor polymorphisms and left ventricular remodeling changes in response to beta-blocker therapy.

Objective: Large variability exists in the improvement in left ventricular (LV) function from beta-blocker treatment. We hypothesized that polymorphisms at codon 389 (Arg389Gly) and 49 (Ser49Gly) in the beta1-adrenergic receptor (AR) gene were associated with LV reverse remodeling changes in response to beta-blocker therapy among heart failure patients.

Methods: We prospectively enrolled 61 beta-blocker naive patients with systolic heart failure.

beta-Adrenergic receptor polymorphisms and responses during titration of metoprolol controlled release/extended release in heart failure.

Objective: beta-Blockers require careful initiation and titration when used in patients with heart failure. Some patients tolerate beta-blocker therapy initiation without difficulty, whereas in other patients this period presents clinical challenges. We tested the hypothesis that polymorphisms at codons 389 (Arg389Gly) and 49 (Ser49Gly) of the beta(1)-adrenergic receptor would be associated with differences in initial tolerability of beta-blocker therapy in patients with heart failure.

Evaluation of electronic databases used to identify solid oral dosage forms.

The ability of electronic drug identification databases to identify solid oral dosage forms by their imprint codes was studied. The following seven commercially available electronic drug identification databases were selected to identify 500 solid oral dosage forms by their imprint codes: Clinical Pharmacology (Gold Standard Media, Tampa, FL), eFacts (Facts and Comparison, St. Louis, MO), Ident-A-Drug (Therapeutic Research, Stockton, CA), Identidex (Micromedex, Greenwood Village, CO), Clinical Reference Library (Lexi-Comp, Hudson, OH), Physicians' Desk Reference (PDR) Electronic Library (Medical Economics, Montvale, NJ), and RxList (RxList LLC, San Francisco, CA), Chi-square test was used to compare the percentages of medications identified by each of the seven electronic references.