Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes
June 2022
Objective: To assess the outcomes of diabetic foot infections (DFIs) due to .
Patients And Methods: From April 24, 2013 to July 31, 2016, we analyzed data from patients prospectively enrolled in our clinical pathway of DFIs, comparing those with infection due to with those without infection due to .
Results: Overall, we assessed 1018 cases of DFIs: 392 with osteomyelitis and 626 with only soft tissue infections.
Background: The optimal duration of antibiotic therapy for soft-tissue infections of the diabetic foot remains unknown.
Objective: We determine if antibiotic therapy after debridement for a short (10 days), compared with a long (20 days), duration for soft-tissue infections of the diabetic foot results in similar rates of clinical remission and adverse events (AE).
Summary Of Background Data: The optimal duration of systemic antibiotic therapy, after successful debridement, for soft tissue infections of diabetic patients is unknown.
Background: In patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) who underwent surgical debridement, we investigated whether a short (3 weeks) duration compared with a long (6 weeks) duration of systemic antibiotic treatment is associated with noninferior results for clinical remission and adverse events (AEs).
Methods: In this prospective, randomized, noninferiority pilot trial, we randomized (allocation 1:1) patients with DFO after surgical debridement to either a 3-week or a 6-week course of antibiotic therapy. The minimal duration of follow-up after the end of therapy was 2 months.
Clinicians frequently monitor serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels during therapy for diabetic foot infections (DFIs), but evidence supporting this is unclear. Using a database from prospective controlled DFI trials, with fixed duration of antibiotic therapy, we correlated the CRP levels at study enrolment and at end of therapy (EOT). Among 159 DFI episodes, 93 involved the bone and 66 the soft tissues.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: Radiographic imaging is an important diagnostic tool in diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO). It is unknown whether DFO cases diagnosed with conventional X-ray versus positive Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) differ regarding epidemiology and treatment outcome. Theoretically, signs of inflammation on MRI without bone lesions might be easier to treat.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMany persons with diabetes mellitus have limb ischemia, which is a major clinical problem. A subset of human monocytes that expresses TIE-2 may enhance neovascularization. We performed 179 phlebotomies on 142 patients (or donors), including 61 patients/donors without diabetes or ischemia (controls), 39 diabetic nonischemic patients (controls), and 42 diabetic patients with severe limb ischemia requiring amputation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: The appropriate duration of antibiotic therapy for diabetic foot infections (DFI) after surgical amputations in toto is debated. There are discrepancies worldwide.
Methods: Using a clinical pathway for adult DFI patients (retrospective cohort analysis), we conducted a cluster-controlled Cox regression analysis.
Aim: To assess amoxicillin-clavulanate (AMC) for the oral therapy of diabetic foot infections (DFIs), especially for diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO).
Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis among 794 DFI episodes, including 339 DFO cases.
Results: The median duration of antibiotic therapy after surgical debridement (including partial amputation) was 30 days (DFO, 30 days).
Aim: To determine the most appropriate duration of antibiotic therapy for diabetic foot infections (DFIs).
Methods: Using a clinical pathway for adult patients with DFIs (retrospective cohort analysis), we created a cluster-controlled Cox regression model to assess factors related to remission of infection, emphasizing antibiotic-related variables. We excluded total amputations as a result of DFI and DFI episodes with a follow-up time of <2 months.
Background: An adjunctive topical therapy with gentamicin-sponges to systemic antibiotic therapy might improve the healing of infected diabetic foot ulcers (DFUI).
Methods: Single-center, investigator-blinded pilot study, randomizing (1:1) the gentamicin-sponge with systemic antibiotic versus systemic antibiotics alone for patients with DFUI.
Results: We included 88 DFUI episodes with 43 patients in the gentamicin-sponge arm and 45 in the control arm.
Objectives: The initial phase of infection of a foot ulcer in a person with diabetes is often categorized as mild. Clinicians usually treat these infections with antimicrobial therapy, often applied topically. Some experts, however, believe that mild diabetic foot ulcer infections will usually heal with local wound care alone, without antimicrobial therapy or dressings.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF: 1 and 2 generation cephalosporins used for perioperative prophylaxis in orthopaedic surgery do not cover non-fermenting Gram-negative rods (NFR). Epidemiological cohort study of adult patients operated for orthopedic infections between 2004 and 2014 with perioperative cefuroxim or vancomycin prophylaxis. Exclusion of polyneuropathic ischemic foot infections and septic bursitis cases.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: After antibiotic therapy of an initial diabetic foot infection (DFI), pathogens isolated from subsequent episodes might become more resistant to commonly prescribed antibiotics. If so, this might require a modification of the current recommendations for the selection of empiric antibiotic therapy. This study investigated whether the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) DFI guideline recommendations should be modified based on the number of past DFI episodes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSome patient populations and types of orthopaedic surgery could be at particular risk for anaerobic infections. In this retrospective cohort study of operated adult patients with infections from 2004 to 2014, we assessed obligate anaerobes and considered first clinical infection episodes. Anaerobes, isolated from intra-operative samples, were identified in 2.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIn diabetic patients, foot ulcer is a common problem which prevalence during life is about 25%. Infection occurs as a complication in almost 50% of cases, is associated with significant morbidity and a reduced quality of life and is sometimes the trigger leading to amputation. Ulcers and infections occur among patients with predisposing factors such as peripheral neuropathy and arterial insufficiency, and require a multi-disciplinary care system.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: In this study, we assess interdisciplinary surgical and medical parameters associated to recurrences of infected pressure ulcers.
Background: There is a little in the published literature regarding factors associated with the outcome of treatment of infected pressure ulcers.
Methods: We undertook a single-center review of spinal injured adults hospitalized for an infected pressure ulcer or implant-free osteomyelitis and reviewed the literature on this topic from 1990-2015.
Background: Clinical experience suggests that a high proportion of orthopaedic infections occur in persons with diabetes.
Methods: We reviewed several databases of adult patients hospitalized for orthopaedic infections at Geneva University Hospitals from 2004 to 2014 and retrieved 2740 episodes of infection.
Results: Overall, diabetes was noted in the medical record for 659 (24%) of these cases.
Diabetic foot infections (DFI) are a common cause of morbidity and, on occasion, even mortality. Infection can be either mono- or polymicrobial, with a wide variety of potential pathogens. Anaerobes may be involved, particularly in wounds that are deeper or more chronic, and are more frequently identified when using modern molecular techniques, such as 16s PCR and pyrosequencing.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF