Physician experiences with and perceptions of risk evaluation and mitigation strategy programs with elements to assure safe use.

Purpose: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Amendments Act of 2007 authorized the FDA to require risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS) programs for drugs with important safety concerns. REMS can have elements to assure safe use (ETASU), such as patient registries, dispensing restrictions, and physician training and certification requirements. We aimed to understand physician experiences with and perceptions of a selection of ETASU REMS.

Evidence at time of regulatory approval and cost of new antibiotics in 2016-19: cohort study of FDA approved drugs.

Objective: To review the clinical evidence, regulatory background, and cost of antibiotics approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 2016-19.

Design: Cohort study of FDA approved drugs.

Data Sources: FDA databases, ClinicalTrials.

Analysis of risk evaluation and mitigation strategies for teratogenic drugs: Variation in primary and secondary prevention measures.

In an analysis of risk evaluation and mitigation strategies for teratogenic drugs, Ameet Sarpatwari, Beatrice Brown and Aaron Kesselheim explore the variation in primary and secondary prevention measures.

Mifepristone, preemption, and public health federalism.

On June 24, 2022, the Supreme Court issued an opinion in which five justices voted to overturn . Even before the final opinion issued, scholars and advocates had begun to consider legal strategies that might mitigate the decision's anticipated harmful consequences. One such strategy involves challenging state restrictions on Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved pregnancy termination drugs on preemption grounds.

Trends in the Quality of Evidence Supporting FDA Drug Approvals: Results from a Literature Review.

Context: New drug approvals in the United States must be supported by substantial evidence from "adequate and well-controlled" trials. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has flexibility in how it applies this standard.

Methods: The authors conducted a systematic literature review of studies evaluating the design and outcomes of the key trials supporting new drug approvals in the United States.

Analysis of Supportive Evidence for US Food and Drug Administration Approvals of Novel Drugs in 2020.

Importance: In recent years, drug approvals have been based on fewer, smaller, and less rigorous pivotal trials. Less robust preapproval testing raises questions about the efficacy and clinical value of these drugs.

Objective: To assess the regulatory context, pivotal design characteristics, and postmarket requirements (PMRs) and postmarket commitments (PMCs) of novel 2020 drug approvals to characterize the state of evidence at the time of approval.

New Drug Postmarketing Requirements and Commitments in the US: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.

Introduction: After the approval of a new drug, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) may issue postmarketing requirements (PMRs), studies that the law requires manufacturers to conduct for drugs approved under certain conditions, and postmarketing commitments (PMCs), studies that the FDA and manufacturers agree should be conducted as a condition of approval.

Objective: With regulators' increasing reliance on gathering important evidence after initial product approval, we sought to assess the track record of PMRs and PMCs by synthesizing information about postmarketing study completion rates, timeliness, study types, and results reporting.

Methods: A systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was conducted.

Patient and Caregiver Experiences With and Perceptions of Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy Programs With Elements to Assure Safe Use.

Importance: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Amendments Act of 2007 authorized the FDA to impose safety requirements on drugs with important risks, such as prescriber certification or routine laboratory testing, to ensure that the benefits of use outweighed the risks. However, little is known about patient and caregiver experiences with these Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) programs with Elements to Assure Safe Use (ETASU).

Objective: To understand patient and caregiver experiences with and perceptions of REMS programs with ETASU.

Payer-Specific Negotiated Prices for Prescription Drugs at Top-Performing US Hospitals.

This cross-sectional study analyzes a group of top-performing hospitals to quantify drug pricing variation across insurers.

How Should Clinicians and Organizations Assess Risks and Benefits of First-in-Human Implantation of Investigational Devices?

The number of new medical devices cleared by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) through the 510(k) pathway that has subsequently been associated with safety risks has led to discussion of approaches to regulation and communication of device risks. As debate continues over whether the pathway needs to be altered, features of ethical use of 510(k)-cleared devices can include (1) heightened caution with respect to newly cleared 510(k) products until adequate data are gathered through postmarket surveillance, (2) facilitating informed consent by improving physician and patient knowledge of the 510(k) pathway, and (3) basing distribution of these devices on individual risk assessments while ensuring equitable access.

Hearing impaired older adults in the acute care setting: An innovation solution to improve care.

Hearing loss is prevalent in the geriatric population. Healthcare systems and providers are challenged to meet communication needs in hearing impaired adults in the acute care setting. Patients with impaired-hearing pose risk to themselves and the healthcare system.

An Overview Of Vaccine Development, Approval, And Regulation, With Implications For COVID-19.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approves vaccines when their benefits outweigh the risks for their intended use. In this article we review the standard FDA approach to vaccine evaluation, which underpins its current approaches to assessment of vaccines to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The FDA has established pathways to accelerate vaccine availability before approval, such as Emergency Use Authorization, and to channel resources to high-priority products and allow more flexibility in the evidence required for approval, including accelerated approval based on surrogate markers of effectiveness.

Ensuring Safe Access to Mifepristone During the Pandemic and Beyond.

This article discusses the risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS) program imposed by the Food and Drug Administration for mifepristone.