GENIUS-MAWII: for robust Mendelian randomization with many weak invalid instruments.

Mendelian randomization (MR) addresses causal questions using genetic variants as instrumental variables. We propose a new MR method, G-Estimation under No Interaction with Unmeasured Selection (GENIUS)-MAny Weak Invalid IV, which simultaneously addresses the 2 salient challenges in MR: many weak instruments and widespread horizontal pleiotropy. Similar to MR-GENIUS, we use heteroscedasticity of the exposure to identify the treatment effect.

Mediation analysis with multiple mediators under unmeasured mediator-outcome confounding.

It is often of interest in the health and social sciences to investigate the joint mediation effects of multiple post-exposure mediating variables. Identification of such joint mediation effects generally require no unmeasured confounding of the outcome with respect to the whole set of mediators. As the number of mediators under consideration grows, this key assumption is likely to be violated as it is often infeasible to intervene on any of the mediators.

Mendelian randomization mixed-scale treatment effect robust identification and estimation for causal inference.

Standard Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis can produce biased results if the genetic variant defining an instrumental variable (IV) is confounded and/or has a horizontal pleiotropic effect on the outcome of interest not mediated by the treatment variable. We provide novel identification conditions for the causal effect of a treatment in the presence of unmeasured confounding by leveraging a possibly invalid IV for which both the IV independence and exclusion restriction assumptions may be violated. The proposed Mendelian randomization mixed-scale treatment effect robust identification (MR MiSTERI) approach relies on (i) an assumption that the treatment effect does not vary with the possibly invalid IV on the additive scale; (ii) that the confounding bias does not vary with the possibly invalid IV on the odds ratio scale; and (iii) that the residual variance for the outcome is heteroskedastic with respect to the possibly invalid IV.

Rare variant association tests for ancestry-matched case-control data based on conditional logistic regression.

With the increasing volume of human sequencing data available, analysis incorporating external controls becomes a popular and cost-effective approach to boost statistical power in disease association studies. To prevent spurious association due to population stratification, it is important to match the ancestry backgrounds of cases and controls. However, rare variant association tests based on a standard logistic regression model are conservative when all ancestry-matched strata have the same case-control ratio and might become anti-conservative when case-control ratio varies across strata.

MR-Corr2: a two-sample Mendelian randomization method that accounts for correlated horizontal pleiotropy using correlated instrumental variants.

Motivation: Mendelian randomization (MR) is a valuable tool to examine the causal relationships between health risk factors and outcomes from observational studies. Along with the proliferation of genome-wide association studies, a variety of two-sample MR methods for summary data have been developed to account for horizontal pleiotropy (HP), primarily based on the assumption that the effects of variants on exposure (γ) and HP (α) are independent. In practice, this assumption is too strict and can be easily violated because of the correlated HP.

IDENTIFICATION AND INFERENCE FOR MARGINAL AVERAGE TREATMENT EFFECT ON THE TREATED WITH AN INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE.

In observational studies, treatments are typically not randomized and therefore estimated treatment effects may be subject to confounding bias. The instrumental variable (IV) design plays the role of a quasi-experimental handle since the IV is associated with the treatment and only affects the outcome through the treatment. In this paper, we present a novel framework for identification and inference using an IV for the marginal average treatment effect amongst the treated (ETT) in the presence of unmeasured confounding.

Discrete Choice Models for Nonmonotone Nonignorable Missing Data: Identification and Inference.

Nonmonotone missing data arise routinely in empirical studies of social and health sciences, and when ignored, can induce selection bias and loss of efficiency. In practice, it is common to account for nonresponse under a missing-at-random assumption which although convenient, is rarely appropriate when nonresponse is nonmonotone. Likelihood and Bayesian missing data methodologies often require specification of a parametric model for the full data law, thus ruling out any prospect for semiparametric inference.

Semiparametric Estimation with Data Missing Not at Random Using an Instrumental Variable.

Missing data occur frequently in empirical studies in health and social sciences, often compromising our ability to make accurate inferences. An outcome is said to be missing not at random (MNAR) if, conditional on the observed variables, the missing data mechanism still depends on the unobserved outcome. In such settings, identification is generally not possible without imposing additional assumptions.

On Inverse Probability Weighting for Nonmonotone Missing at Random Data.

The development of coherent missing data models to account for nonmonotone missing at random (MAR) data by inverse probability weighting (IPW) remains to date largely unresolved. As a consequence, IPW has essentially been restricted for use only in monotone missing data settings. We propose a class of models for nonmonotone missing data mechanisms that spans the MAR model, while allowing the underlying full data law to remain unrestricted.

Principled Approaches to Missing Data in Epidemiologic Studies.

Principled methods with which to appropriately analyze missing data have long existed; however, broad implementation of these methods remains challenging. In this and 2 companion papers (Am J Epidemiol. 2018;187(3):576-584 and Am J Epidemiol.

Inverse-Probability-Weighted Estimation for Monotone and Nonmonotone Missing Data.

Missing data is a common occurrence in epidemiologic research. In this paper, 3 data sets with induced missing values from the Collaborative Perinatal Project, a multisite US study conducted from 1959 to 1974, are provided as examples of prototypical epidemiologic studies with missing data. Our goal was to estimate the association of maternal smoking behavior with spontaneous abortion while adjusting for numerous confounders.

Multiple Imputation for Incomplete Data in Epidemiologic Studies.

Epidemiologic studies are frequently susceptible to missing information. Omitting observations with missing variables remains a common strategy in epidemiologic studies, yet this simple approach can often severely bias parameter estimates of interest if the values are not missing completely at random. Even when missingness is completely random, complete-case analysis can reduce the efficiency of estimated parameters, because large amounts of available data are simply tossed out with the incomplete observations.

Estimation of kinship coefficient in structured and admixed populations using sparse sequencing data.

Knowledge of biological relatedness between samples is important for many genetic studies. In large-scale human genetic association studies, the estimated kinship is used to remove cryptic relatedness, control for family structure, and estimate trait heritability. However, estimation of kinship is challenging for sparse sequencing data, such as those from off-target regions in target sequencing studies, where genotypes are largely uncertain or missing.

A Multinomial Regression Approach to Model Outcome Heterogeneity.

When a risk factor affects certain categories of a multinomial outcome but not others, outcome heterogeneity is said to be present. A standard epidemiologic approach for modeling risk factors of a categorical outcome typically entails fitting a polytomous logistic regression via maximum likelihood estimation. In this paper, we show that standard polytomous regression is ill equipped to detect outcome heterogeneity and will generally understate the degree to which such heterogeneity may be present.