Publications by authors named "Bandrowski A"

Antibody-based research applications are critical for biological discovery. Yet there are no industry standards for comparing the performance of antibodies in various applications. We describe a knockout cell line-based antibody characterization platform, developed and approved jointly by industry and academic researchers, that enables the systematic comparison of antibody performance in western blot, immunoprecipitation and immunofluorescence.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Data interoperability is crucial for effectively combining data for scientific inquiry. To facilitate interoperability, data standards such as a common definition of variables are often developed. The Open Data Commons for Spinal Cord Injury (odc-sci.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Tables are useful information artifacts that allow easy detection of data "missingness" by humans and have been deployed by several publishers to improve the amount of information present for key resources and reagents such as antibodies, cell lines, and other tools that constitute the inputs to a study. The STAR*Methods tables, specifically, have increased the "findability" of these key resources, but they have not been commonly available outside of the Cell Press journal family. To improve the availability of these tables in the broader biomedical literature, we have attempted to automatically process BioRxiv preprints to create tables from text or to recognize tables already created by authors and structure them for later use by publishers and search systems, to improve "findability" of resources in a larger amount of the scientific literature.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Antibodies are important in scientific research, but many of them haven't been properly tested, making some research results questionable.
  • There have been efforts to fix this problem, especially for antibodies that work with human proteins.
  • The article suggests ways that different people and organizations, like researchers and universities, can help make sure future studies with antibodies are more reliable.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The use of living biological samples is crucial for preserving and documenting biological diversity, requiring reliable identification and data association for effective use and exchange of these materials.
  • There is currently no standardized naming system for identifying animal biological materials, which can lead to misidentification and data loss.
  • A newly proposed naming scheme aims to create unique identifiers for animal cellular materials, particularly for wildlife species, enhancing traceability and supporting long-term conservation efforts and biomedical research.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Antibodies are one of the most important reagents used in biomedical and fundamental research, used to identify, and quantify proteins, contribute to knowledge of disease mechanisms, and validate drug targets. Yet many antibodies used in research do not recognize their intended target, or recognize additional molecules, compromising the integrity of research findings and leading to waste of resources, lack of reproducibility, failure of research projects, and delays in drug development. Researchers frequently use antibodies without confirming that they perform as intended in their application of interest.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Research resources like transgenic animals and antibodies are the workhorses of biomedicine, enabling investigators to relatively easily study specific disease conditions. As key biological resources, transgenic animals and antibodies are often validated, maintained, and distributed from university based stock centers. As these centers heavily rely largely on grant funding, it is critical that they are cited by investigators so that usage can be tracked.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Antibodies are critical reagents to detect and characterize proteins. It is commonly understood that many commercial antibodies do not recognize their intended targets, but information on the scope of the problem remains largely anecdotal, and as such, feasibility of the goal of at least one potent and specific antibody targeting each protein in a proteome cannot be assessed. Focusing on antibodies for human proteins, we have scaled a standardized characterization approach using parental and knockout cell lines (Laflamme et al.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Conversations about open science have reached the mainstream, yet many open science practices such as data sharing remain uncommon. Our efforts towards openness therefore need to increase in scale and aim for a more ambitious target. We need an ecosystem not only where research outputs are openly shared but also in which transparency permeates the research process from the start and lends itself to more rigorous and collaborative research.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - Antibodies are essential for detecting and studying proteins, but many commercial antibodies may not effectively target their intended proteins, a problem that remains mostly anecdotal; this study evaluates the performance of 614 commercial antibodies on 65 neuroscience-related proteins to quantify the issue.
  • - The research found that over 50% of tested antibodies failed in various assessments, yet around 50-75% of the protein targets had at least one high-performing antibody available, indicating a significant coverage of human proteins despite the issues.
  • - Notably, recombinant antibodies outperformed traditional monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies, and the study identified many poorly performing antibodies that had been widely used in publications, prompting manufacturers to reassess and improve their products
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Characterizing cellular diversity at different levels of biological organization and across data modalities is a prerequisite to understanding the function of cell types in the brain. Classification of neurons is also essential to manipulate cell types in controlled ways and to understand their variation and vulnerability in brain disorders. The BRAIN Initiative Cell Census Network (BICCN) is an integrated network of data-generating centers, data archives, and data standards developers, with the goal of systematic multimodal brain cell type profiling and characterization.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Preprints, versions of scientific manuscripts that precede peer review, are growing in popularity. They offer an opportunity to democratize and accelerate research, as they have no publication costs or a lengthy peer review process. Preprints are often later published in peer-reviewed venues, but these publications and the original preprints are frequently not linked in any way.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Antibodies are ubiquitous key biological research resources yet are tricky to use as they are prone to performance issues and represent a major source of variability across studies. Understanding what antibody was used in a published study is therefore necessary to repeat and/or interpret a given study. However, antibody reagents are still frequently not cited with sufficient detail to determine which antibody was used in experiments.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Improving rigor and transparency measures should lead to improvements in reproducibility across the scientific literature; however, the assessment of measures of transparency tends to be very difficult if performed manually.

Objective: This study addresses the enhancement of the Rigor and Transparency Index (RTI, version 2.0), which attempts to automatically assess the rigor and transparency of journals, institutions, and countries using manuscripts scored on criteria found in reproducibility guidelines (eg, Materials Design, Analysis, and Reporting checklist criteria).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Research resource identifiers (RRIDs) are persistent unique identifiers for scientific resources used to conduct studies such as reagents and tools. Inclusion of these identifiers into the scientific literature has been demonstrated to improve the reproducibility of papers because resources, like antibodies, are easier to find, making methods easier to reproduce. RRIDs also dramatically reduce the use of problematic resources, such as contaminated cell lines.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The rising rate of preprints and publications, combined with persistent inadequate reporting practices and problems with study design and execution, have strained the traditional peer review system. Automated screening tools could potentially enhance peer review by helping authors, journal editors, and reviewers to identify beneficial practices and common problems in preprints or submitted manuscripts. Tools can screen many papers quickly, and may be particularly helpful in assessing compliance with journal policies and with straightforward items in reporting guidelines.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The Data and Resource Center (DRC) of the NIH-funded SPARC program is developing databases, connectivity maps, and simulation tools for the mammalian autonomic nervous system. The experimental data and mathematical models supplied to the DRC by the SPARC consortium are curated, annotated and semantically linked via a single knowledgebase. A data portal has been developed that allows discovery of data and models both via semantic search and via an interface that includes Google Map-like 2D flatmaps for displaying connectivity, and 3D anatomical organ scaffolds that provide a common coordinate framework for cross-species comparisons.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A vast array of commercial antibodies covers a large percentage of human gene products, but determining which among them is most appropriate for any given application is challenging. This leads to use of non-specific antibodies that contributes to issues with reproducibility. It is our opinion that the community of scientists who use commercial antibodies in their biomedical research would benefit from third-party antibody characterization entities that use standardized operating procedures to assess and compare antibody performance.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Antibodies are widely used reagents to test for expression of proteins and other antigens. However, they might not always reliably produce results when they do not specifically bind to the target proteins that their providers designed them for, leading to unreliable research results. While many proposals have been developed to deal with the problem of antibody specificity, it is still challenging to cover the millions of antibodies that are available to researchers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The National Institute on Drug Abuse and Joint Institute for Biological Sciences at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory hosted a meeting attended by a diverse group of scientists with expertise in substance use disorders (SUDs), computational biology, and FAIR (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reusability) data sharing. The meeting's objective was to discuss and evaluate better strategies to integrate genetic, epigenetic, and 'omics data across human and model organisms to achieve deeper mechanistic insight into SUDs. Specific topics were to (a) evaluate the current state of substance use genetics and genomics research and fundamental gaps, (b) identify opportunities and challenges of integration and sharing across species and data types, (c) identify current tools and resources for integration of genetic, epigenetic, and phenotypic data, (d) discuss steps and impediment related to data integration, and (e) outline future steps to support more effective collaboration-particularly between animal model research communities and human genetics and clinical research teams.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The reproducibility crisis is a multifaceted problem involving ingrained practices within the scientific community. Fortunately, some causes are addressed by the author's adherence to rigor and reproducibility criteria, implemented via checklists at various journals. We developed an automated tool (SciScore) that evaluates research articles based on their adherence to key rigor criteria, including NIH criteria and RRIDs, at an unprecedented scale.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In the wake of the reproducibility crisis and numerous discussions on how commercially available antibodies as research tool contribute to it, The Antibody Society developed a series of 10 webinars to address the issues involved. The webinars were delivered by speakers with both academic and commercial backgrounds. This report highlights the problems, and offers solutions to help the scientific community appropriately identify the right antibodies and to validate them for their research and development projects.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The ever accelerating pace of biomedical research results in corresponding acceleration in the volume of biomedical literature created. Since new research builds upon existing knowledge, the rate of increase in the available knowledge encoded in biomedical literature makes the easy access to that implicit knowledge more vital over time. Toward the goal of making implicit knowledge in the biomedical literature easily accessible to biomedical researchers, we introduce a question answering system called Bio-AnswerFinder.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF