Publications by authors named "BIELING H"

Purpose To (a) compare the diagnostic accuracy of breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with that of conventional imaging (digital mammography and breast ultrasonography) in the identification of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) components of biopsy-proven invasive breast cancer before surgery and (b) investigate the surgical outcome (positive margin rates and mastectomy rates) of women with breast cancer who underwent preoperative MR imaging combined with MR-guided needle biopsy and/or MR-guided lesion localization or bracketing where appropriate. Materials and Methods The authors performed a prospective two-center study of 593 consecutive patients with biopsy-proven invasive breast cancer who underwent breast MR imaging in addition to conventional imaging. MR-guided vacuum biopsy and MR-guided lesion bracketing were performed for DCIS components visible at MR imaging alone.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose To investigate the utility and accuracy of breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging as a supplemental screening tool in women at average risk for breast cancer and to investigate the types of cancer detected with MR imaging screening. Materials and Methods This prospective observational study was conducted at two academic breast centers in women aged 40-70 years without breast cancer-associated risk factors (lifetime risk <15%). Between January 2005 and December 2013, women with at least minimal residual breast tissue (American College of Radiology categories A-D) and normal conventional imaging findings (screening mammography with or without screening ultrasonography [US]) were invited to undergo supplemental MR imaging screening.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: We investigated whether an abbreviated protocol (AP), consisting of only one pre- and one postcontrast acquisition and their derived images (first postcontrast subtracted [FAST] and maximum-intensity projection [MIP] images), was suitable for breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening.

Methods: We conducted a prospective observational reader study in 443 women at mildly to moderately increased risk who underwent 606 screening MRIs. Eligible women had normal or benign digital mammograms and, for those with heterogeneously dense or extremely dense breasts (n = 427), normal or benign ultrasounds.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: We conducted a systematic analysis of factors (manual vs automated and unidimensional vs 3-dimensional size assessment, and impact of different target lesion selection) contributing to variability of response categorization in the Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors 1.1.

Patients And Methods: A total of 41 female patients (58.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: We investigated the respective contribution (in terms of cancer yield and stage at diagnosis) of clinical breast examination (CBE), mammography, ultrasound, and quality-assured breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), used alone or in different combination, for screening women at elevated risk for breast cancer.

Methods: Prospective multicenter observational cohort study. Six hundred eighty-seven asymptomatic women at elevated familial risk (> or = 20% lifetime) underwent 1,679 annual screening rounds consisting of CBE, mammography, ultrasound, and MRI, read independently and in different combinations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Diagnosing breast cancer in its intraductal stage might be helpful to prevent the development of invasive cancer. Our aim was to investigate the sensitivity with which ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is diagnosed by mammography and by breast MRI.

Methods: During a 5-year period, 7319 women who were referred to an academic national breast centre received MRI in addition to mammography for diagnostic assessment and screening.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To define the range of normal contrast medium enhancement, the variability in contrast medium enhancement patterns in healthy premenopausal breast parenchyma, and the implications for management strategies in cases with incidental contrast medium-enhancing foci on breast magnetic resonance (MR) images.

Materials And Methods: Twenty healthy volunteers (aged 21-41 years) were examined on a 1.5-T system (dynamic two-dimensional gradient-echo protocol with subtraction postprocessing) during each week of a menstrual cycle (group 1) or over 4 months (group 2).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To evaluate the differentiation of benign from malignant breast tumors with T2*-weighted perfusion magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (blood volume imaging) versus that with dynamic T1-weighted contrast agent-enhanced MR imaging.

Materials And Methods: Ten healthy adult volunteers and 18 adult patients with benign or malignant lesions underwent both conventional T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging and repetitive first-pass, single-section, dynamic T2*-weighted perfusion MR imaging. Images were obtained before, during, and after injection of 20 mL of gadopentetate dimeglumine; peak gadopentetate dimeglumine concentrations were calculated from the maximal signal intensity loss on T2*-weighted images.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To evaluate quantitative analysis of dynamic breast MRI studies using a dedicated PC based diagnosis system (DS) providing parametric images and automatic ROI definition as compared to the standard subtraction image, manual-ROI based procedure.

Methods: We compared the diagnostic usefulness of parametric versus subtraction images in terms of visualisation of enhancement inhomogeneities and enhancement velocities. Quantitative analysis of enhancing lesions of 15 breast MRI studies was performed using both the DS and the system's console software (SC).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF