Coercive measures in disability and mental health care services: Mechanical restraints from a bioethical and legal perspective in Spain.

This article explores the use of coercive measures, particularly mechanical and pharmacological restraints, in disability care settings and mental health services from a bioethical perspective, focusing on how these practices impact the human rights of individuals with mental disorder, focusing on how these practices impact the human rights of individuals with mental disorders. A robust bioethical framework is presented, advocating for principles of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, dignity, dialogical justice, distributive justice, and vulnerability. These principles are integrated to reframe interventions and promote respect for patient rights.

Validation of "the patient evaluation of emotional care during hospitalisation" questionnaire in intensive care unit patients.

Objective: To validate the "Patient Evaluation of Emotional Care During Hospitalization" (PEECH) questionnaire, which assesses hospitalised patients' emotional experiences, in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).

Interventions: Prospective study. The PEECH consists of three sections and four sub-scales: "level of security", "level of knowing", "level of personal value", and "level of connection".

[Transcultural validation to spanish of the Patient Evaluation of Emotional Care During Hospitalisation Questionnaire].

Introduction: The emotional experience of patients must be ascertained to ensure patient-centred care during hospitalisation. Improving this experience has a positive impact on patient prognosis. Therefore, in order to provide comprehensive care, therefore, patient emotional care needs must be known.

[Hygeia and virtue or remembering Protagoras: dialogue on community health ethics. SESPAS Report 2018].

A dialogue between ethics and public health on the moral implications of the promotion of community health in which the importance of respecting autonomy and contributing to the empowerment of the community with which it collaborates is highlighted; in addition to the appropriateness of an explicit commitment that sets out the limits of collaboration and the opportunity for a specific deontology.