Introduction: Active drag in swimming is a critical variable that affects swimmers' performance, as well as the physiological load, but it is challenging for practitioners to assess this variable. This study aimed to assess if the load-velocity profiling method can be used as an indicator of active drag.
Methods: A total of 419 swimmers performed three semitethered swimming trials in their speciality among the four competitive strokes with different external loads.
This study investigated the relationships between load-velocity profiling and 50 m breaststroke performance. Twenty-seven male swimmers qualified for the national championship participated and performed a 50 m breaststroke trial with a multicamera system. The total race time (t), forward velocity during surface swimming (v), stroke length, and stroke frequency were obtained from the automatic post-processing of the system.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe study estimated lower and upper extremity contributions to whole-body front crawl swimming using semi-tethered load-velocity profiling. Nine female and 11 male (inter)national-level swimmers performed 20 m semi-tethered sprints, each with five progressive loads for lower (leg kicking), upper (arm stroke), and whole-body front crawl movements. The theoretical maximal speed (v) and load (L), and active drag (D) were expressed as a percentage of the sum of both extremities for the movements of each extremity to calculate their contributions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThis study aimed to evaluate the test-retest reliability of a sprint performance test with semi-tethered front crawl swimming to indirectly assess the current potential to perform at maximal anaerobic effort in adolescent swimmers. Eight adolescent swimmers participated in this study (gender: females (n = 4) aged 13.0 ± 0.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Sports Physiol Perform
January 2024
Purpose: The present study aimed to establish differences in load-velocity profiling, active drag (AD), and drag coefficient (Cd) between 3 age groups of female swimmers.
Methods: Thirty-three swimmers (11, 13, or 16 y old) were recruited. The individual load-velocity profile was determined for the 4 competitive swimming strokes.