[Imaging diagnosis of parotid diseases--a comparison of methods].

Thirty-five patients with parotid gland disorders were ultrasonographically examined with a "small parts" scanner, as well as with high-resolution computed tomography, and conventional and digital subtracted sialography. The results were compared with clinical, surgical, and pathomorphological data. In cases of parotid gland masses, the sensitivity of sonography, CT, and sialography was 100%, 81%, and 70% respectively, while in cases of sialadenitis, sensitivity was 38%, 50%, and 75%.

Digital subtraction sialography, conventional sialography, high-resolution ultrasonography and computed tomography in the diagnosis of salivary gland diseases.

Forty-one patients with salivary gland disorders have been evaluated by digital subtraction sialography, conventional sialography, high-resolution ultrasonography and computed tomography, and the results compared with clinical, surgical and pathomorphological data. In the case of salivary gland masses, the sensitivity of ultrasonography, CT and digital subtraction sialography was 100%, 82% and 71%, respectively, while in the case of sialadenitis, the respective figures were 54%, 69% and 85%. The image quality of digital subtraction sialography was superior to that of conventional sialography in 80%, equal in 16%, and inferior in 3% of the examinations.

[Digital subtraction sialography].

In 22 patients we performed 33 sialographies of salivary glands using digital subtraction technique as well as conventional technique (100 mm camera). In the majority of cases the digital subtraction technique was superior to the conventional technique regarding diagnostic image quality. Additionally, digital subtraction technique generally needs a lower number of contrast media application.

[Digital subtraction dacryocystography and sialography].

Fourteen examinations of the tear ducts and 21 sialograms were performed using digital subtraction and conventional techniques. In nine of the former and 15 of the latter, digital subtraction produced better results, in the remainder conventional technique was equally good. The advantages of digital subtraction are due to the removal of superimposed structures of the skull.