Inefficacy of dietary test substance administration in Amphibian Metamorphosis Assay (AMA) studies.

Traditionally, the Amphibian Metamorphosis Assay (AMA; OECD TG 231) is performed by exposing Xenopus laevis tadpoles to test substances dissolved in laboratory water. Recently, the use of dietary administration has been proposed to combat poorly soluble test substances in ecotoxicologically-based regulatory endocrine disruption (ED) studies, specifically the AMA warranting an investigation into the efficacy of dietary administration. An efficacy study comprised of two phases: 1) evaluation of the physical influence of the loading process via solvent and 10, 1, and 0.

Genetically modified DP915635 maize is agronomically and compositionally comparable to non-genetically modified maize.

DP915635 maize was genetically modified (GM) to express the IPD079Ea protein for corn rootworm (Diabrotica spp.) control. DP915635 maize also expresses the phosphinothricin acetyltransferase (PAT) protein for tolerance to glufosinate herbicide and the phosphomannose isomerase (PMI) protein that was used as a selectable marker.

Transgene expression in sprayed and non-sprayed herbicide-tolerant genetically engineered crops is equivalent.

Regulations governing the safety assessment of genetically engineered (GE) crops require studies that measure the expression levels of the transgene products (proteins and double-stranded RNA) in the GE crop; furthermore, the regulations also often mandate the inclusion of an entry of the GE crop that is sprayed with the herbicide to which tolerance was engineered and a non-sprayed entry of the GE crop in said studies. The hypothesized unique risk of altered transgene expression in response to application of herbicides related to herbicide-tolerant GE crops, compared with application of other herbicides, is not readily apparent. Field studies were conducted with GE maize, soybean, and cotton breeding stacks containing multiple herbicide tolerance traits; studies included plots that were sprayed with the trait-related herbicides and plots that were unsprayed.

Transgene-product expression levels in genetically engineered breeding stacks are equivalent to those of the single events.

Transgene product expression levels are measured in genetically engineered (GE) crops containing single transformation events and the measured expression levels are then utilized in food, feed, and environmental safety assessments as part of the requirements for de-regulation of the event. Many countries also require measurement of expression levels and safety assessments for GE breeding stacks, even though the breeding stacks are composed of single events that have been previously assessed. Transgene product expression levels were measured in tissues of maize, soybean, and cotton breeding stacks and each of their component single events.

EFSA Genetically Engineered Crop Composition Equivalence Approach: Performance and Consistency.

The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) oversees the safety assessment of genetically engineered (GE) crops in the European Union and has developed a study design and statistical approach for assessing the compositional equivalency between a GE crop and the corresponding non-GE crop on the basis of the results from a small number of concurrently grown reference lines. Confidence limits around the differences in mean analyte composition between the GE variety and the reference lines are compared with equivalence limits on the basis of the variability of the reference lines. Here, we evaluated the performance and consistency of the equivalence conclusions using a non-GE variety that is, by definition, equivalent to the non-GE crop.